Nicolle Marshall v. Abbott Laboratories et al

Filing 32

JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Nicolle Marshall take nothing from the Defendants Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories Inc., AbbVie, Inc. and Aneta Austin, and each of them, that the action be dismissed on the merits and that Defendants recover their costs as permitted by law. (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro)

ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO
A Professional Corporation
2 Scott K. Dauscher
State Bar No. 204105
12800 Center Court Drive South, Suite 300
3 Cerritos, California 90703-9364
Telephone: [phone]
4 Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
1

5

GOLDBERG KOHN LTD.
David E. Morrison (admitted pro hac vice)
Kathryn B. Walter (admitted pro hac vice)
7 55 East Monroe, Suite 3300
Chicago, Illinois 60603
8 Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
9 [e-mail]
[e-mail]

JS-6

6

10
11

Attorneys for Defendants Abbott Laboratories, Abbott
Laboratories Inc., AbbVie, Inc. and Aneta Austin

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

NICOLLE MARSHALL,

Case No.: 8:13-cv-01867-JVS-JEM
Plaintiff,

15
16

vs.

17

JUDGMENT

ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ABBOTT
LABORATIES INC., which conducts
business in California as ABBOTT
SALES, MARKETING &
DISTRIBUTION CO.; ABBVIE, INC.;
ANETA AUSTIN;DOES 1 THROUGH
20,

18
19
20

Defendants.

21
22
23

This action came on for hearing before the Court on September 15, 2014,

24

Honorable James V. Selna, District Court Judge presiding, on a motion for

25

summary judgment by Defendants Abbott Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories

26

Inc., AbbVie, Inc. and Aneta Austin.

27

considered, the issues having been duly heard and a decision having been duly

28

rendered:

Goldberg Kohn Ltd.

The evidence having been fully

[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Atto r ne ys At La w
C hi ca go

014519.00011
12375886.1

6010322v1 8/12/2014 3:19 PM

4651.186

1

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Nicolle

2

Marshall take nothing from the Defendants Abbott Laboratories, Abbott

3

Laboratories Inc., AbbVie, Inc. and Aneta Austin, and each of them, that the

4

action be dismissed on the merits and that Defendants recover their costs as

5

permitted by law.

6
7

Dated: September 22, 2014

8
9
10

By: ______________________
____
Judge of the United States District Court

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Goldberg Kohn Ltd.
Atto r ne ys At La w
C hi ca go

014519.00011
12375886.1

-2[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT