Juan Carlos Vidal v. Warden Paramo
Filing
16
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 14 . The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the Objections. IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (dml)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
JUAN CARLOS VIDAL,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
WARDEN PARAMO,
)
)
)
Respondent.
)
________________________________
Case No. SACV 13-1960 JVS(JC)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,
CONCLUSIONS, AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of
19 Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (the “Petition”) and all of the records
20 herein, including the attached Report and Recommendation of United States
21 Magistrate Judge (“Report and Recommendation”), and petitioner’s objections to
22 the Report and Recommendation (“Objections”). The Court has further made a de
23 novo determination of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which
24 objection is made. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions,
25 and recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge and overrules the
26 Objections.
27
IT IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered denying the Petition and
28 dismissing this action with prejudice.
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order, the
2 Report and Recommendation, and the Judgment herein on petitioner and counsel
3 for respondent.
4
LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.
5
6
DATED: July 1, 2015
7
8
________________________________________
9
HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?