Oculu, LLC v. Oculus VR, Inc. et al

Filing 174

ORDER GRANTING Stipulated Notice of Dismissal of all Claims Against Oculus VR With Prejudice and Counterclaims Against Oculu, LLC Without Prejudice by Judge David O. Carter, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case, 173 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (dgo)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

BOBBY GHAJAR (SBN 198719) ([e-mail])
MARCUS D. PETERSON (SBN 265339) ([e-mail]
PILLSBURY WINTHROP SHAW PITTMAN LLP
725 South Figueroa Street, Suite 2800
Los Angeles, CA 90017-5406
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile No.: [phone]
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) ([e-mail])
BENJAMIN KLEINE (257225) ([e-mail])
AMANDA A. MAIN (260814) ([e-mail])
COOLEY LLP
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
OCULUS VR, INC.
Olivier A. Taillieu (SBN 206546)
[e-mail]
The Taillieu Law Firm LLP
450 N. Roxbury Drive, Suite 700
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Phone [phone] • Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Oculu, LLC

14
15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA–SOUTHERN DIVISION

18
19
20
21
22

Oculu, LLC,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Oculus VR, Inc.,
Defendant.

23
24
25
26

And Related Counterclaim

Case No. 8:14-SACV-196-DOC (JPRx)
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF ALL
CLAIMS AGAINST OCULUS VR WITH
PREJUDICE AND COUNTERCLAIMS
AGAINST OCULU, LLC WITHOUT
PREJUDICE [173]
Judge:
Hon. David O. Carter
Magistrate: Hon. Jean P. Rosenbluth
Pretrial Conference: N/A
Trial Date:
July 13, 2015

27
28

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED NOTICE OF
DISMISSAL
Case No. 8:14-SACV-196-DOC (JPRx)

1
2
3
4

Having reviewed the parties’ Stipulated Notice of Dismissal, and for good
cause showing:
1. Oculu’s claims against Oculus VR are hereby be dismissed with prejudice
pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

5

2. Oculus VR’s counterclaim against Oculu is hereby dismissed without

6

prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;

7

3. Each party shall bear their own fees and costs; and

8

4. This Court shall retain jurisdiction for the enforcement of the settlement

9
10
11

agreement between the parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 13, 2015.

12
13
14
15

Honorable David O. Carter
United States District Court Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED NOTICE OF
DISMISSAL
Case No. 8:14-SACV-196-DOC (JPRx)