D. Alexander et al v. Michaels Stores, Inc., et al

Filing 36

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 35 : Please refer to the Court's order for additional information. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cr)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J. ANDERSON, L. HERNANDEZ, T. HUME, 12 R. KOPSTEIN, M. MOLINA, 13 G. POWERS, P. RECLA, and 14 M. VIRAMONTES, 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Plaintiffs, 5 5 v. 5 5 MICHAELS STORES, INC., a 5 Delaware corporation, 5 5 Defendant. 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 44444444444444444444444444444444444444448 Case Number: SACV 14-342-GW(AGRx) ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE [No hearing required] Judge: HON. GEORGE H. WU 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE – PAGE 1 1 CAME ON to be considered the Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action, 2 With Prejudice, entered by and among Plaintiffs, J. Anderson, L. Hernandez, T. 3 Hume, R. Kopstein, M. Molina, G. Powers, P. Recla, and M. Viramontes (hereinafter 4 collectively “Plaintiffs”) on the one hand, and Defendant, Michaels Stores, Inc. 5 (hereinafter “Michaels”), on the other hand, and the Court has found that the relief 6 requested therein should be GRANTED. 7 8 9 10 11 12 IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, that all claims of all Plaintiffs in the abovecaptioned civil action shall be, and hereby are, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the above-captioned civil action is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and TERMINATED in the entirety; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that, except as may otherwise be agreed among the parties, each party shall bear its own costs and fees. 13 14 Dated: December 20, 2017 15 GEORGE H. WU, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 [SA14CV00342GW-O JS-6.wpd] 28 ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE – PAGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?