D. Alexander et al v. Michaels Stores, Inc., et al
Filing
36
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. Wu, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 35 : Please refer to the Court's order for additional information. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (cr)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
J. ANDERSON,
L. HERNANDEZ,
T. HUME,
12 R. KOPSTEIN,
M. MOLINA,
13 G. POWERS,
P. RECLA, and
14 M. VIRAMONTES,
11
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
Plaintiffs,
5
5
v.
5
5
MICHAELS STORES, INC., a
5
Delaware corporation,
5
5
Defendant.
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
44444444444444444444444444444444444444448
Case Number:
SACV 14-342-GW(AGRx)
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
[No hearing required]
Judge:
HON. GEORGE H. WU
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE – PAGE 1
1
CAME ON to be considered the Stipulation for Dismissal of Entire Action,
2
With Prejudice, entered by and among Plaintiffs, J. Anderson, L. Hernandez, T.
3
Hume, R. Kopstein, M. Molina, G. Powers, P. Recla, and M. Viramontes (hereinafter
4
collectively “Plaintiffs”) on the one hand, and Defendant, Michaels Stores, Inc.
5
(hereinafter “Michaels”), on the other hand, and the Court has found that the relief
6
requested therein should be GRANTED.
7
8
9
10
11
12
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED, that all claims of all Plaintiffs in the abovecaptioned civil action shall be, and hereby are, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the above-captioned civil action is hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and TERMINATED in the entirety;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that, except as may otherwise be agreed among
the parties, each party shall bear its own costs and fees.
13
14
Dated: December 20, 2017
15
GEORGE H. WU, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
[SA14CV00342GW-O JS-6.wpd]
28
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE – PAGE 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?