Bipin Bhakta v. Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company, et al

Filing 51

JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company against Bipin Bhakta Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 50 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dgo)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

JS-6

CHARLES J. VINICOMBE (appearing pro hac vice)
NOLAN B. TULLY (appearing pro hac vice)
ALEXIS N. BURGESS (SBN 279328)
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLP
1800 Century Park East, Suite 1400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-1517
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY
INSURANCE COMPANY

9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION

12
13

BIPIN BHAKTA, an individual,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Plaintiff,
v.
HARTFORD LIFE AND ANNUITY
INSURANCE COMPANY, a
Connecticut corporation; and DOES
1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.

Case No. 8:14-cv-00351-DOC-AN
[PROPOSED]
XXXXXXXXXX JUDGMENT FOR
DEFENDANT

[Concurrently filed with Notice of Motion
and Motion; Memorandum of Points and
Authorities; Separate Statement of
Uncontroverted Facts; Declaration of
Nolan B. Tully; [Proposed] Order
Granting Defendant’s Motion;
Application to File Under Seal; and
[Proposed] Order Granting Application
to File Under Seal]
Date: March 2, 2015
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Dept.: 9D

23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT
XXXXXX

1

The Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary

2

Judgment (the “Motion”) filed by Defendant Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance

3

Company (“Defendant”) against plaintiff Bipin Bhakta’s (“Plaintiff”) Complaint

4

came on for hearing on March 2, 2015 before the Honorable David O. Carter in

5

Department 9D of the above-entitled Court. Charles Vinicombe of Drinker Biddle

6

& Reath LLP appeared on behalf of Defendant, and Michael Horrow of Donahue &

7

Horrow, L.L.P. appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. For the reasons stated in

8

Defendant’s Memorandum of Points and Authorities, and based on the authority

9

cited therein and all of the admissible evidence presented, the Motion was

10

GRANTED. Accordingly, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY

11

ORDERED that:

12

1.

Judgment in the above-captioned action is hereby entered in favor of

13

Defendant and against Plaintiff such that Plaintiff shall take nothing by his

14

Complaint; and

15

2.

16

Defendant shall recover its costs in an amount to be determined in

accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d).

17
18
19

March 4, 2015
________________
Date

__________________________
United States District Judge

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

XXXXXXJUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT
[PROPOSED]