Cell-Crete Corporation, et al. v. Lexington Insurance Company
Filing
115
(IN CHAMBER) ORDER by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. In light of the District Judges February 5, 2015, order granting defendants motion for partial summary judgment and motion for judgment on the pleadings, plaintiff, no later than February 10, 2015, shall notify the Court of its intention to proceed with the Finberg and Reed depositions. *See Order for details.* (es)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL
Case No. SA CV 14-503-AG (PLAx)
Date February 9, 2015
Title: Cell-Crete Corporation, et al. v. Lexington Insurance Company
G U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE
PAUL L. ABRAMS
Christianna Howard
Deputy Clerk
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFFS:
: MAGISTRATE JUDGE
N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANTS:
NONE
PROCEEDINGS:
N/A
Tape No.
NONE
(IN CHAMBERS)
The Court is in receipt of the Notice Regarding Scheduling Depositions of Nancy Finberg and Rodrick Reed,
filed by defendant on February 6, 2015. Plaintiff did not timely file a response to the Court’s February 4, 2015,
Order. It appears from defendant’s filing that the parties have not agreed upon a schedule for these depositions,
and that defendant unilaterally set the Finberg deposition for February 17, 2015.
In light of the District Judge’s February 5, 2015, order granting defendant’s motion for partial summary
judgment and motion for judgment on the pleadings, plaintiff, no later than February 10, 2015, shall notify
the Court of its intention to proceed with the Finberg and Reed depositions. Plaintiff’s failure to timely
respond to this Order will result in the Court vacating its February 4, 2015, Order requiring that these two
depositions proceed.
It is so ordered.
cc:
Counsel of Record
Initials of Deputy Clerk
CV-90 (10/98)
CIVIL MINUTES -
GENERAL
ch
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?