Steven Rensel et al v. Fluidmaster, Inc.
Filing
32
PROTECTIVE ORDER Regarding Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged or Protected Information by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, good cause appearing, that terms of the Stipulation 31 and [Proposed] Protective Order Regardi ng Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged or Protected Information [FRE 502] as agreed to by the Parties in the above action meets with the approval of the Court and that the Stipulation and Protective Order Regarding Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged or Protected Information [FRE 502] is GRANTED. (dro)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
KLINEDINST PC
777 S. FIGUEROA ST., SUITE 2800
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
[DISCOVERY MATTER]
Plaintiff,
14
15
Case No. SA CV 14-00648 PA (DFMx)
STEVEN RENSEL & BRIAN
KIRSCH, individually and on behalf
of all others similarly situated,
[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING INADVERTENT
DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED OR
PROTECTED INFORMATION [FRE
502]
v.
16
FLUIDMASTER, INC.,
17
Defendant.
Courtroom:
Judge:
Magistrate Judge:
Complaint Filed:
Trial Date:
18
19
20
15
Honorable Percy Anderson
Honorable Douglas F. McCormick
April 24, 2014
None set
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, good cause appearing, that terms of the
21
Stipulation and [Proposed] Protective Order Regarding Inadvertent Disclosure of
22
Privileged or Protected Information [FRE 502] as agreed to by the Parties in the
23
above action meets with the approval of the Court and that the Stipulation and
24
Protective Order Regarding Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged or Protected
25
Information [FRE 502] is GRANTED.
26
27
28
DATED: June 23, 2014
DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK
United States Magistrate Judge
-1[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED OR PROTECTED INFORMATION
[FRE 502]
SA CV 14-00648 PA (DFMx)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?