Steven Rensel et al v. Fluidmaster, Inc.

Filing 32

PROTECTIVE ORDER Regarding Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged or Protected Information by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, good cause appearing, that terms of the Stipulation 31 and [Proposed] Protective Order Regardi ng Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged or Protected Information [FRE 502] as agreed to by the Parties in the above action meets with the approval of the Court and that the Stipulation and Protective Order Regarding Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged or Protected Information [FRE 502] is GRANTED. (dro)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 KLINEDINST PC 777 S. FIGUEROA ST., SUITE 2800 LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 [DISCOVERY MATTER] Plaintiff, 14 15 Case No. SA CV 14-00648 PA (DFMx) STEVEN RENSEL & BRIAN KIRSCH, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED OR PROTECTED INFORMATION [FRE 502] v. 16 FLUIDMASTER, INC., 17 Defendant. Courtroom: Judge: Magistrate Judge: Complaint Filed: Trial Date: 18 19 20 15 Honorable Percy Anderson Honorable Douglas F. McCormick April 24, 2014 None set IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, good cause appearing, that terms of the 21 Stipulation and [Proposed] Protective Order Regarding Inadvertent Disclosure of 22 Privileged or Protected Information [FRE 502] as agreed to by the Parties in the 23 above action meets with the approval of the Court and that the Stipulation and 24 Protective Order Regarding Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged or Protected 25 Information [FRE 502] is GRANTED. 26 27 28 DATED: June 23, 2014 DOUGLAS F. McCORMICK United States Magistrate Judge -1[PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING INADVERTENT DISCLOSURE OF PRIVILEGED OR PROTECTED INFORMATION [FRE 502] SA CV 14-00648 PA (DFMx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?