Operation Technology Inc v. Cyme International T & D Inc., et al

Filing 278

STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna: Now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff ETAP and against Defendant. See document for further information. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (lwag)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 William J. O’Brien (Bar No. 99526) wobrien@onellp.com ONE LLP 9301 Wilshire Boulevard Penthouse Suite Beverly Hills, California 90210 Telephone: (310) 866-5158 Facsimile: (310) 943- 2085 Kristin L. Cleveland (Bar No. 184639) kristin.cleveland@klarquist.com Salumeh R. Loesch (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) salumeh.loesch@klarquist.com John D. Vandenberg (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) john.vandenberg@klarquist.com KLARQUIST SPARKMAN LLP 121 SW Salmon Street, Suite 1600 Portland, OR 97204 Telephone: (503) 595-5300 Facsimile: (503) 595-5301 JS-6 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Operation Technology, Inc. 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 SOUTHERN DIVISION 17 OPERATION TECHNOLOGY, INC., 18 19 Plaintiff, v. 20 21 22 Case No. SACV 14-00999-JVS (DFMx) Hon. James V. Selna STIPULATED PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND CONSENT JUDGMENT CYME INTERNATIONAL T & D INC. Defendant. 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED INJUNCTION AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Plaintiff Operation Technology, Inc. (“ETAP”) pursued this action for false advertising under Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act against Defendant CYME International T&D Inc. (“CYME” or “Defendant”). The Parties have entered into a confidential settlement agreement. The Parties, by and through their undersigned counsel, consented to entry of this Permanent Injunction and Consent Judgment. Now, therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff ETAP and against Defendant. a. accused materials are literally false. 11 12 13 14 i. 17 18 19 20 21 22 Power.Engineers” and “Independent Engineerse” “channels” on YouTube. ii. 25 26 27 Literally false material has been distributed via email by the following e-mail accounts: arghavan.e1985@gmail.com; OLA.D.36@gmail.com; sa.sasirana@gmail.com; stan.3626@gmail.com; prashanth.s.9863@gmail.com; independent.power.engineers@gmail.com; powersystem.expertengineer@gmail.com; muhammad.uhjl@gmail.com; ahmed.sh9311@gmail.com; validating.elec.software@gmail.com. 23 24 Literally false material has been posted in videos associated with “Independent Power Engineers”, “Independent 15 16 The Court previously found on summary judgment that the iii. Literally false material has been posted on the following website: ipengeineers.net. b. The Court hereby adopts the following Jury findings: (1) ETAP proved by a preponderance of the evidence that defendant directly engaged in false advertising against ETAP by creating or distributing the accused 28 STIPULATED INJUNCTION AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 1 1 statements; (2) ETAP proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Amir 2 Aslani directly engaged in false advertising against ETAP by creating or 3 distributing the accused statements; and (3) ETAP proved by a 4 preponderance of the evidence under the Court’s instructions that Defendant 5 was responsible for Amir Aslani’s conduct. 6 2. All claims are dismissed with prejudice. 7 3. The parties consent to this Court retaining jurisdiction over the action 8 and compliance with the parties’ confidential settlement, and this Consent 9 Judgment and Permanent Injunction. INJUNCTION ORDER 10 11 4. As to Defendant: Defendant and each of its successors, officers, 12 agents, employees, and attorneys and all persons, partnerships or corporations in 13 present or future active concert or participation with Defendant or any other person, 14 partnership or corporation acting on behalf of Defendant, are enjoined from 15 advertising, publishing, repeating or disseminating, whether explicitly or implicitly 16 and whether directly or indirectly, any of the statements the Court held to be 17 literally false (collected in Ex. 200) (or any substantially similar statements 18 disparaging ETAP software unless first verified beyond a reasonable doubt to be 19 from an authentic, legitimate source and not associated with Amir Aslani or 20 Defendant). 21 5. The Court hereby issues the following orders with respect to certain 22 electronic resources, and authorizes ETAP to deliver a copy of this judgment to 23 third parties who may control access to said resources: 24 A. All videos associated with “Independent Power Engineers,” 25 “Independent Power.Engineers,” and any substantially similar named entity, 26 purporting to report problems with ETAP software, are hereby ordered to be 27 taken down from YouTube. 28 STIPULATED INJUNCTION AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 2 1 B. 2 any future web site with substantially the same content disparaging ETAP 3 shall be deactivated. 4 C. 5 customers as part of the smear campaign, are hereby ordered to be 6 deactivated from Google: arghavan.e1985@gmail.com; 7 OLA.D.36@gmail.com; sa.sasirana@gmail.com; stan.3626@gmail.com; 8 prashanth.s.9863@gmail.com; independent.power.engineers@gmail.com; 9 powersystem.expertengineer@gmail.com; muhammad.uhjl@gmail.com; 10 ahmed.sh9311@gmail.com; validating.elec.software@gmail.com 11 Any domain for ipengeineers.net (currently ONLINENIC, INC.) and The following “gmail” accounts associated with fake experts and fake IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 DATED: October 11, 2016 15 16 By: The Honorable James V. Selna IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 18 Dated: October 7, 2016 KLARQUIST SPARKMAN, LLP By: /s/ Kristin L. Cleveland Kristin L. Cleveland Salumeh R. Loesch John D. Vandenberg Dated: October 7, 2016 JONES DAY By: /s/ Jeffrey A. LeVee Jeffrey A. LeVee Christopher K. Pelham 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED INJUNCTION AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 3 1 SIGNATURE CERTIFICATION 2 Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2)(i), Kristin L. Cleveland attests that 3 concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Jeffrey LeVee 4 and that she is authorized to affix Mr. LeVee’s electronic signature to this 5 document. 6 7 Dated: October 7, 2016 By:/s/ Kristin L. Celveland 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED INJUNCTION AND CONSENT JUDGMENT 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?