Young Hyun Cho et al v. Seterus

Filing 15

JUDGMENT of Dismissal with Prejudice by Judge Josephine L. Staton. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a Judgment of Dismissal with Prejudice is entered in favor of Defendant, SETERUS, INC., and against Plaintiffs, YOUNG HYUN CHO and SUNG EUN CHO JANG. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

Download PDF
  JS-6        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA   YOUNG HYUN CHO; SUNG EUN  CHO JANG, Assigned to Honorable Josephine L. Staton  Plaintiffs, v.   Case No.: SACV14-01094-JLS (RNBx) JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE SETERUS, and DOES 1 to 10,  Defendant.  [Notice of Plaintiffs’ Failure to File a Motion for Leave to Amend Filed Concurrently Herewith]    On September 2, 2014, the Motion to Dismiss of Defendant, SETERUS, INC.  (“Seterus”), to the Complaint of Plaintiffs, YOUNG HYUN CHO and SUNG EUN CHO  JANG (collectively “Plaintiffs”) came before the Honorable Josephine L. Staton, wherein  the Court granted Seterus’ Motion to Dismiss. This Court further ordered that any  Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint be filed no later than September 23,  2014.    1 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL  Based on Plaintiffs’ failure to file a Motion for Leave to File an Amended   Complaint within the time ordered by this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:  The entire action is dismissed with prejudice but without attorneys’ fees and costs.  IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that a Judgment of Dismissal with  Prejudice is entered in favor of Defendant, SETERUS, INC., and against Plaintiffs,  YOUNG HYUN CHO and SUNG EUN CHO JANG.    SO ORDERED:   Dated: October 3, 2014  JOSEPHINE L. STATON  Honorable Josephine L. Staton United States District Judge                    2 ________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?