Platinum Properties Investor Network, Inc. et al v. AMCO Insurance Company
Filing
68
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi: Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to show cause in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. (PST) on April 21, 2016, why they should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with this Court's Orders by paying the fees awarded to AMCO totaling $27,285.00. In addition, a hearing will be held on April 28, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 6A, located at 411 West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, California 92701, at which time the Court will consider whether to issue an order of contempt, which order could include the imposition of additional fees and/or an arrest warrant. The Court expects payment in full of the $27,285.00 will be forthcoming. (kh)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
PLATINUM PROPERTIES
INVESTOR NETWORK, INC., a
California corporation; and JASON
HARTMAN, an individual,
Plaintiffs,
14
15
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
vs.
16
CASE NO. 8:14-cv-01321-AG-JCG
NATIONWIDE INSURANCE, and
DOES 1 through 100,
17
Defendants.
18
19
Having reviewed the papers submitted by Defendant AMCO INSURANCE
20
COMPANY’s (“AMCO”) motion for an order to show cause as to why Plaintiffs
21
PLATINUM PROPERTIES INVESTOR NETWORK, INC. and JASON
22
HARTMAN (“Plaintiffs”) should not be held in contempt for failing to comply
23
with this Court’s Orders of November 12, 2015, and February 4, 2016, by failing
24
to pay to AMCO the total amount of $27,285.00, and having heard argument on
25
the matter on April 7, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., and good cause existing, the Court hereby
26
GRANTS the motion in its entirety and makes the following orders:
27
28
Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to show cause in writing on or before 5:00
p.m. (PST) on April 21, 2016, why they should not be held in contempt for failing
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?