Platinum Properties Investor Network, Inc. et al v. AMCO Insurance Company

Filing 68

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi: Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to show cause in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. (PST) on April 21, 2016, why they should not be held in contempt for failing to comply with this Court's Orders by paying the fees awarded to AMCO totaling $27,285.00. In addition, a hearing will be held on April 28, 2016 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 6A, located at 411 West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, California 92701, at which time the Court will consider whether to issue an order of contempt, which order could include the imposition of additional fees and/or an arrest warrant. The Court expects payment in full of the $27,285.00 will be forthcoming. (kh)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 PLATINUM PROPERTIES INVESTOR NETWORK, INC., a California corporation; and JASON HARTMAN, an individual, Plaintiffs, 14 15 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE vs. 16 CASE NO. 8:14-cv-01321-AG-JCG NATIONWIDE INSURANCE, and DOES 1 through 100, 17 Defendants. 18 19 Having reviewed the papers submitted by Defendant AMCO INSURANCE 20 COMPANY’s (“AMCO”) motion for an order to show cause as to why Plaintiffs 21 PLATINUM PROPERTIES INVESTOR NETWORK, INC. and JASON 22 HARTMAN (“Plaintiffs”) should not be held in contempt for failing to comply 23 with this Court’s Orders of November 12, 2015, and February 4, 2016, by failing 24 to pay to AMCO the total amount of $27,285.00, and having heard argument on 25 the matter on April 7, 2016 at 2:00 p.m., and good cause existing, the Court hereby 26 GRANTS the motion in its entirety and makes the following orders: 27 28 Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to show cause in writing on or before 5:00 p.m. (PST) on April 21, 2016, why they should not be held in contempt for failing ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?