InfoSpan Inc. v. Emirates NBD Bank PJSC

Filing 131

ORDER ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS INFOSPAN, INC AND INFOSPAN (GULF), INC., by Judge James V. Selna. Related to: Notice of Lodging 130 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

BOIES, SCHILLER & FLEXNER LLP
William A. Isaacson (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
David Boyd (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
Jonathan M. Shaw (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
5301 Wisconsin Ave.
Washington, DC 20015
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 202-237-6131
David L. Zifkin (SBN 232845)
[e-mail]
401 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 850
Santa Monica, CA 90401
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-752-2490

JS-6

14

BIRD, MARELLA, BOXER, WOLPERT, NESSIM,
DROOKS, LINCENBERG & RHOW, P.C.
Terry W. Bird (SBN 49038)
[e-mail]
1875 Century Park East, 23rd Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 310-201-2110

15

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

11
12
13

16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

18

SOUTHERN DIVISION

19
20
21

InfoSpan, Inc. and InfoSpan (Gulf),
Inc.,
Plaintiffs,

22
23
24
25

v.

Case No. 8:14-CV-1679 JVS (ANx)
ORDER ENTERING
FINAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF
PLAINTIFFS INFOSPAN, INC. AND
INFOSPAN (GULF), INC.

Emirates NBD Bank PJSC,
Defendant.

Complaint Filed: October 17, 2014

26
27
28
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT IN
FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS

This above-captioned action was compelled to arbitration in California for

1
2

Plaintiffs InfoSpan, Inc.’s and InfoSpan (Gulf), Inc.’s (“Plaintiffs”) claim for

3

declaratory relief against the Defendant Emirates NBD Bank PJSC (“Bank”).
On September 28, 2015, the Court issued an Order compelling arbitration of

4
5

Plaintiffs’ claim for declaratory relief. The parties have stipulated the Hon. Gary L.

6

Taylor (ret.) will serve as the arbitrator. Subsequently, on December 14, 2015, the

7

Court issued an Order denying Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Pending Arbitration while

8

also retaining jurisdiction in this action for the limited purpose of enforcing its

9

Order to compel arbitration. The Court now issues a final judgment as follows:
1.

10

Judgment is entered in Plaintiffs’ favor on the Bank’s Motion to Dismiss

11

for Lack of Jurisdiction and Improper Venue, as set forth in the Minute Order

12

issued on July 27, 2015.
2.

13
14

Arbitration, as set forth in the Minute Order issued on September 28, 2015.
3.

15
16

4.

All other claims asserted and parties named in this action were previously

dismissed with prejudice or are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
5.

19
20

Judgment is entered in the Bank’s favor on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Stay

Pending Arbitration, as set forth in the Minute Order issued on December 14, 2015.

17
18

Judgment is entered in Plaintiffs’ favor on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel

The Court retains jurisdiction in this action for the limited purpose of

enforcing its Order to compel arbitration.
6.

21

As the prevailing parties in this litigation, Plaintiffs are entitled to recover

22

costs. Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1); Civ. L.R. 54-1. In accordance with Local Rule

23

///

24
25
26

///
///

27
28
1

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT IN
FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS

1

54-2, Plaintiffs shall file their Notice of Application to the Clerk to Tax Costs and

2

Proposed Bill of Costs within fourteen (14) days after the entry of this judgment.

3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

5
6
7

Dated: January 04, 2016

8
9
10

Hon. James V. Selna
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT IN
FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS