Kristin Hanson et al v. Harold La Flamme et al

Filing 162

MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff R.M., to show cause in writing no later than July 5, 2019, why this action shoul d not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court notes that Plaintiff R.M. could face sanctions including attorney's fees, dismissal or monetary sanctions, for failure to appear at the status conference, failure to prosecute and failure to obey Court orders. (See document for further details) (es)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Case No. SACV 14-01823-AG (DFMx) Date Title June 25, 2019 Kristin Hanson et al v. Harold La Flamme et al PRESENT: HONORABLE ANDREW J. GUILFORD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Melissa Kunig Deputy Clerk Not Reported Court Reporter ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF: Not Present PROCEEDINGS: ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT: Not Present (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION On February 11, 2019, the Court held a status conference regarding the mandate issued by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals. Plaintiff R.M. failed to appear at this hearing. Plaintiff R.M. is the only remaining plaintiff in this action since Plaintiff Hanson was dismissed. The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff R.M., to show cause in writing no later than July 5, 2019, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. The Court notes that Plaintiff R.M. could face sanctions including attorney’s fees, dismissal or monetary sanctions, for failure to appear at the status conference, failure to prosecute and failure to obey Court orders. Initials of Deputy Clerk : - mku cc: CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?