Leucadio Diaz et al v. Capstone Logistics, LLC et al
Filing
18
ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 17 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mba)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
LEUCADIO DIAZ, BENITO DIAZ,
ADAN DIAZ, JORGE BARRIENTOS,
JUAN JOSE CARMONA, JOSE LUIS
APARICIO, ELTON MAURIZIO RAZO
THOMAS,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. SACV14-1867 JLS (ANx)
ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH
PREJUDICE
v.
CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC; LMS
INTELLIBOUND; PROGRESSIVE
LOGISTICS SERVICES, LLC; HUGO
LEON, an individual, and DOES 1 to 50,
inclusive,
Defendants.
24
Complaint Filed
Removal Filed
F.P.C.
Trial
:
:
:
:
July 3, 2014
November 24, 2014
February 12, 2016
March 1, 2016
25
26
27
28
ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE
21304861v.1
1
The Court having considered the Joint Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice
2
Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)-(B), filed on December 17,
3
2015, by Plaintiff Leucadio Diaz, Plaintiff Benito Diaz, Plaintiff Adan Diaz, Plaintiff
4
Jorge Barrientos, Plaintiff Juan Jose Carmona, Plaintiff Jose Luis Aparicio, and Plaintiff
5
Elton Maurizio Razo Thomas (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Capstone
6
Logistics, LLC (“Capstone”), Defendant LMS Intellibound, LLC (“LMS”), Defendant
7
Progressive Logistics Services, LLC (“PLS”), and Defendant Hugo Leon (collectively,
8
“Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, and good cause appearing,
9
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
10
1.
The case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice.
11
2.
Each party shall bear its own fees and costs.
12
13
14
15
Dated: December 17, 2015
16
JOSEPHINE L. STATON
Hon. Josephine L. Staton
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE
21304861v.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?