Leucadio Diaz et al v. Capstone Logistics, LLC et al

Filing 18

ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Josephine L. Staton, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 17 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mba)

Download PDF
1 2 JS-6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 LEUCADIO DIAZ, BENITO DIAZ, ADAN DIAZ, JORGE BARRIENTOS, JUAN JOSE CARMONA, JOSE LUIS APARICIO, ELTON MAURIZIO RAZO THOMAS, Plaintiffs, Case No. SACV14-1867 JLS (ANx) ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE v. CAPSTONE LOGISTICS, LLC; LMS INTELLIBOUND; PROGRESSIVE LOGISTICS SERVICES, LLC; HUGO LEON, an individual, and DOES 1 to 50, inclusive, Defendants. 24 Complaint Filed Removal Filed F.P.C. Trial : : : : July 3, 2014 November 24, 2014 February 12, 2016 March 1, 2016 25 26 27 28 ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE 21304861v.1 1 The Court having considered the Joint Stipulation For Dismissal With Prejudice 2 Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)-(B), filed on December 17, 3 2015, by Plaintiff Leucadio Diaz, Plaintiff Benito Diaz, Plaintiff Adan Diaz, Plaintiff 4 Jorge Barrientos, Plaintiff Juan Jose Carmona, Plaintiff Jose Luis Aparicio, and Plaintiff 5 Elton Maurizio Razo Thomas (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Capstone 6 Logistics, LLC (“Capstone”), Defendant LMS Intellibound, LLC (“LMS”), Defendant 7 Progressive Logistics Services, LLC (“PLS”), and Defendant Hugo Leon (collectively, 8 “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, and good cause appearing, 9 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 10 1. The case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. 11 2. Each party shall bear its own fees and costs. 12 13 14 15 Dated: December 17, 2015 16 JOSEPHINE L. STATON Hon. Josephine L. Staton United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 ORDER TO DISMISS CASE WITH PREJUDICE 21304861v.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?