Semiserve, Inc. et al v. Semicon Services, LLC et al

Filing 130

JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 1. Judgment is entered in favor Semiserve, Inc., Stuart Proctor and Kirsteen Proctor in the amount of $2,155,500.77, jointly and severally against Semicon Services, LLC, Retronix International, Inc., and Retronix Semiconductor Limited; 2. Interest on all sums shall accrue at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum from and after entry of judgment, calculated simply, pursuant to section 28 of the Settlement Agreement. (es/tg)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 SEMISERVE, INC., a Nevada corporation, STUART PROCTOR, an individual, and KIRSTEEN PROCTOR, an individual, 13 14 15 16 17 Plaintiffs, 20 SEMICON SERVICES, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company, an individual, and DOES 1-20, Defendants. SEMICON SERVICES, LLC, and RETRONIX INTERNATIONAL, INC., Counterclaim-Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JUDGMENT v. 18 19 Case No.: 8:14-cv-02009-JLS (DFM) Judge: Hon. Josephine L. Staton Court Room: 10A v. SEMISERVE, INC., STUART PROCTOR, and KIRSTEEN PROCTOR, Counterclaim-Defendants. 1 2 JUDGMENT WHEREAS, Plaintiffs Semiserve, Inc., Stuart Proctor and Kirsteen Proctor 3 (“Plaintiffs”) on the one hand and Defendants Semicon Services, LLC, Retronix 4 International, Inc., and settling party Retronix Semiconductor Limited 5 (“Defendants”) on the other hand executed that certain Share Repurchase, 6 Separation and Mutual General Release Agreement dated December 31, 2015 (the 7 “Settlement Agreement”); 8 9 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs and Defendants mutually sought, and on May 31, 2016, this Court issued, an Order for Dismissal in the above-captioned action, and 10 expressly retained jurisdiction, pursuant to Section 28 of the Settlement Agreement, 11 to enforce the terms of the Settlement Agreement; 12 WHEREAS, section 28 of the Settlement Agreement provides that, “in the 13 event that [Defendants] breach any obligation to pay the sums owed under Section 14 3(k), Semiserve can enforce the terms of this Agreement and have a judgment 15 entered against all of the [Defendants] for the full amount of the Purchase Price, 16 less any payments already made. Such judgment, once entered, shall accrue 17 interest at the rate of 10% per annum”; 18 WHEREAS, section 25 of the Settlement Agreement provides that “[I]f any 19 action at law or in equity, or any motion, is brought to enforce this Agreement, the 20 prevailing Party shall be entitled to all of its costs in bringing and prosecuting said 21 action or motion, including reasonable attorneys’ fees”; 22 WHEREAS, there came before the Court Plaintiffs’ Motion to Enforce 23 Settlement Agreement (the “Motion”) alleging Defendants’ breach of payment 24 obligations under the Settlement Agreement, which was fully briefed by the parties; 25 WHEREAS, the Court issued an order granting the Motion on May 4, 2017; 26 27 28 -2- 1 WHEREAS¸ section 28 of the Settlement Agreement therefore entitles 2 Plaintiffs to have judgment entered in their favor, with interest to accrue at a rate of 3 ten percent per annum, calculated simply, from and after entry of judgment; 4 IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 5 1. Judgment is entered in favor Semiserve, Inc., Stuart Proctor and Kirsteen 6 Proctor in the amount of $2,155,500.77, jointly and severally against 7 Semicon Services, LLC, Retronix International, Inc., and Retronix 8 Semiconductor Limited; 9 2. Interest on all sums shall accrue at the rate of ten (10) percent per annum 10 from and after entry of judgment, calculated simply, pursuant to section 11 28 of the Settlement Agreement. 12 13 14 15 DATED: May 04, 2017 16 HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?