John Raymond Celis v. County of Orange, et al.

Filing 58

JUDGMENT Granting Summary Judgment in Favor of Defendant County of Orange by Judge James V. Selna: For the reasons set forth in the Court's ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, dated October 19, 2016, it is therefore ORDE RED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: Defendant County of Orange's Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant County of Orange; Plaintiff has and recovers nothing by his suit; and Defendant County of Orange is entitled to recover its costs and charges expended and have execution therefor. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lwag)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14

JOHN RAYMOND CELIS,

15
16

Plaintiff,
vs.

17
18
19
20
21

COUNTY OF ORANGE, DEPUTY
CARLOS CAMMON, and DOES
1 - 100, inclusive,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: SACV-15-00299-JVS-JCG
JUDGMENT GRANTING
SUMMARY JUDGMENT IN FAVOR
OF DEFENDANT COUNTY OF
ORANGE

MATTER FOR DETERMINATION
BEFORE THE HONORABLE
JAMES V. SELNA

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

JUDGMENT

2

After full consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment by Defendant

3

County of Orange, the Opposition and Reply papers, the evidence, and the

4

authorities submitted, the Court finds there is no triable issue of material fact in this

5

case, and Defendant County of Orange is entitled to summary judgment as a matter

6

of law.

7

For the reasons set forth in the Court’s ORDER GRANTING

8

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, dated October 19,

9

2016, it is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that:

10

Defendant County of Orange’s Motion for Summary Judgment is

11

granted;

12

Judgment is entered in favor of Defendant County of Orange;

13

Plaintiff has and recovers nothing by his suit; and

14

Defendant County of Orange is entitled to recover its costs and

15

charges expended and have execution therefor.

16

IT IS SO ORDERED.

17
18
19

DATED: October 27, 2016

20

_________________________________
HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA
United States District Judge

21
22
23

Submitted by:

24

LAWRENCE BEACH ALLEN & CHOI, PC

25
26
27
28

By

/s/ David D. Lawrence
DAVID D. LAWRENCE
CHRISTINA M. SPRENGER
NICOLE E. HOIKKA
Attorneys for Defendant,
2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1

COUNTY OF ORANGE

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT