Michael M. Sato v. Orange County Department of Education

Filing 36

JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Based on the Court's July 6, 2015 Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. 29), and the Court's August 25, 2015 Order Granting Plaintiff's Moti on for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice of Plaintiff's Breach of Contract Cause of Action (Doc. 34), this action has now been adjudicated in full as to the single Plaintiff and single Defendant in this case. It is hereby ORDERED that Judgment be entered in favor of the Defendant, Orange County Department of Education, that the Plaintiff, Michael M. Sato, recover nothing, and that the action be dismissed on the merits. (lwag)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

Case No. SACV 15-00311 JLS (JCGx)
12
13

MICHAEL M. SATO,

14

Plaintiff,

JUDGMENT

15
16
17
18
19

vs.
ORANGE COUNTY DEPARTMENT
OF EDUCATION,
Defendant.

20
21
22

Based on the Court’s July 6, 2015 Order Granting in Part and Denying in
23
24
25

Part Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint (Doc. 29), and the Court’s August
25, 2015 Order Granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice

26
27
28
1

1
2

of Plaintiff’s Breach of Contract Cause of Action (Doc. 34), this action has now
been adjudicated in full as to the single Plaintiff and single Defendant in this case.

3

It is hereby ORDERED that Judgment be entered in favor of the Defendant,
4
5
6

Orange County Department of Education, that the Plaintiff, Michael M. Sato,
recover nothing, and that the action be dismissed on the merits.

7
8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9
10
11
12

Dated: September 14, 2015

__________________________________
Honorable Josephine L. Staton
United States District Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2