Jack R. Finnegan v. A. Patrick Munoz et al

Filing 28

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge 26 by Judge Dale S. Fischer: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United Sta tes Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) defendant's Motions to Dismiss are granted; (2) the Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; and (3) Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice. (lwag)

O
1

O

2

June 26, 2015

3

K
H

4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11

JACK R. FINNEGAN,

12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
A. PATRICK MUNOZ, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. SACV 15-0420-DSF (RNB)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS
AND RECOMMENDATIONS
OF UNITED STATES
MAGISTRATE JUDGE

17

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, records on file

18

herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

19

Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and

20

Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings

21

and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

22

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that (1) defendants’ Motions to Dismiss are

23

granted; (2) the Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend; and (3) Judgment be

24

entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

25
26
27
28

DATED:

6/25/15
DALE S. FISCHER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE