Shelby Phillips, III et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Filing
41
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge James V. Selna: Order Staying Motion to Transfer Case 40 and Motions to Dismiss 38 39 . STAYING 38 MOTION to Dismiss ; STAYING 39 MOTION to Dismiss Case ; STAYING 40 MOTION to Transfer Case. (twdb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Date
Case No.
SACV 15-718 JVS (DFMx)
Title
July 20, 2015
Phillips v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
Present: The
Honorable
James V. Selna
Nancy Boehme
Not Present
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Not Present
Not Present
Proceedings:
(IN CHAMBERS) Order Staying Motion to Transfer Case [40] and
Motions to Dismiss [38][39]
SFPP, L.P., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. “D,” and Kinder Morgan G.P.,
Inc. (collectively, “Kinder Morgan”) have moved to transfer this case to the
Northern District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). (Docket No. 40.) In
view of the pending motion before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation to
transfer this and other cases to a single forum for pretrial proceedings, In re: SFPP, L.P.
Railroad Property Rights Litigation, MDL Docket No. 2647, the Court stays the present
motion until the Panel has acted. At that time, the Court will set a briefing schedule as
appropriate.
For similar reasons, the Court stays the motions to dismiss filed by Kinder
Morgan and Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Docket Nos. 38, 39.) Should the Panel
order transfer to a single court, it is likely that the transferee forum would order the fling
of a single consolidated complaint.
:
Initials of Preparer
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
00
nkb
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?