Arvin Ko v. Bank of America NA et al

Filing 44

JUDGMENT of Dismissal With Prejudice by Judge Cormac J. Carney. In light of the parties' stipulation of dismissal filed with the Court on January 12, 2017 (Dkt. No. 42 ), and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS that a judgment of dismissa l with prejudice be ordered in this matter. It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: A judgment of dismissal with prejudice is hereby entered against Plaintiff, and in favor of Defendant Bank of America, N.A. Plaintiff's case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, Plaintiff shall take nothing against Bank of America, N.A., and each party shall bear its own costs and fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. (dro)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION 9 10 ARVIN KO, 11 12 CASE NO. 8:15-cv-00770-CJC-DFM Plaintiff, Hon. Cormac J. Carney, Judge vs. 13 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; and 14 DOES 1-10, inclusive, 15 16 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE Defendants. In light of the parties’ stipulation of dismissal filed with the Court on January 17 12, 2017 (Dkt. No. 42), and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS that a 18 judgment of dismissal with prejudice be ordered in this matter. It is therefore 19 ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 20 A judgment of dismissal with prejudice is hereby entered against Plaintiff, 21 and in favor of Defendant Bank of America, N.A. Plaintiff’s case is hereby 22 dismissed with prejudice, Plaintiff shall take nothing against Bank of America, 23 N.A., and each party shall bear its own costs and fees. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 Dated: April 17, 2017 26 HON. CORMAC J. CARNEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 1 JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?