Joseph Weinberg v. Valeant Pharmaceuticals International et al
Filing
75
JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott, in favor of Bausch and Lomb Incorporated, Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation, Obagi Medical Products Inc, Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America, LLC against Joseph Weinberg. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 74 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
1
2
3
JS-6
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 JOSEPH WEINBERG, an individual,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
vs.
15 VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS
16 NORTH AMERICA, LLC, a Delaware
corporation; and DOES 1 through 50,
17 inclusive,
18
CASE NO: 8:15-CV-01260-KES
Action Filed:
Trial Date:
August 6, 2015
October 10, 2017
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
WHEREAS, on August 6, 2015, Plaintiff Joseph Weinberg (“Plaintiff”) filed his
23 Complaint against Defendants Valeant Pharmaceuticals International (“VPI”), Obagi
24 Medical Products Inc. (“Obagi”), Medicis Pharmaceutical Corporation (“Medicis”), and
25 Bausch and Lomb Incorporated (“Bausch and Lomb”);
26
WHEREAS, on November 4, 2015, the Court granted the Motion to Dismiss filed
27 by VPI, Obagi, Medicis, and Bausch and Lomb, thereby dismissing all claims against
28
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 8:15-CV-01260-DOC-KES
1
Obagi, Medicis, and Bausch and Lomb without prejudice, and dismissing claims three
2
through eight against VPI without prejudice [Docket No. 29];
3
WHEREAS, Plaintiff did not file an amended Complaint;
4
WHEREAS, on December 6, 2016, the remaining parties filed a joint stipulation
5
replacing VPI with Defendant Valeant Pharmaceuticals North America, LLC (“VPNA”)
6
[Docket No. 50];
7
8
9
WHEREAS, on August 10, 2017, the Court granted Defendant VPNA’s Motion
for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 73], as to all claims remaining against VPNA;
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered in favor of VPNA,
10 that Plaintiff Joseph Weinberg take nothing from VPNA, that the action against VPNA
11 be dismissed with prejudice on the merits and that VPNA recover its costs.
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered in
13 favor of Obagi, that Plaintiff Joseph Weinberg take nothing from Obagi, that the action
14 against Obagi be dismissed with prejudice on the merits and that Obagi recover its costs.
15
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered in
16 favor of Medicis, that Plaintiff Joseph Weinberg take nothing from Medicis, that the
17 action against Medicis be dismissed with prejudice on the merits and that Medicis
18 recover its costs.
19
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment be entered in
20 favor of Bausch and Lomb, that Plaintiff Joseph Weinberg take nothing from Bausch
21 and Lomb, that the action against Bausch and Lomb be dismissed with prejudice on the
22 merits and that Bausch and Lomb recover its costs.
23
24 DATED: August 23, 2017
25
______________________________
Honorable Karen E. Scott
United States District Judge
26
27
28
2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
CASE NO. 8:15-CV-01260-DOC-KES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?