Joseph Rodriguez Montgomery v. E Arnold

Filing 20

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Cormac J. Carney. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of t he United States Magistrate Judge 18 . No Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. (kl)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10
11
12

JOSEPH RODRIGUEZ MONTGOMERY,

13

Petitioner,

14
15
16

v.
E. ARNOLD,
Respondent.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. SACV 15-1341-CJC (JEM)
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED
STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the
records on file, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States
Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Amended Report and Recommendation have been
filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and
recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2)
Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice.

25
26
27
28

DATED: November 1, 2017
CORMAC J. CARNEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE