Blair Christopher Hanloh v. Sandra Hutchens
Filing
9
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of United States Magistrate Judge by Judge Josephine L. Staton: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of t he United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings andrecommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. (lwag)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SOUTHERN DIVISION
11
BLAIR CHRISTOPHER HANLOH, ) No. SA CV 15-01540-JLS (DFM)
12
Petitioner,
13
v.
14
SANDRA HUTCHENS,
15
Respondent.
16
)
)
) Order Accepting Findings and
)
) Recommendation of United States
) Magistrate Judge
)
)
)
)
)
17
18
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636, the Court has reviewed the petition, the
19
other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the
20
United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo
21
review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which
22
objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and
23
recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing
this action without prejudice.
3
4
Dated: March 7, 2016
______________________________
JOSEPHINE L. STATON
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?