Michael N. Okafor v. State of California Department of Conservation

Filing 58

JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. The arguments having been presented and fully considered, and in accordance with the Court's January 23, 2018, Order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant State of California Department of Conserva tion on Plaintiff Michael Okafor's operative First Amended Complaint, It is therefore now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is entered in this action as follows: 1. Plaintiff Michael Okafor shall recover nothing from Defendant State of California Department of Conservation on Plaintiff Michael Okafor's operative First Amended Complaint, and his claims are dismissed on their merits and with prejudice; 2. Defendant State of California Department of Conservation shall have j udgment in its favor on Plaintiff Michael Okafor's operative First Amended Complaint; and 3. Defendant shall recover from Plaintiff Michael Okafor costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920. IT IS SO ORDERED. (dro)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SOUTHERN DIVISION

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

)
) Case No.: SACV 15-01626-CJC(JCGx)
)
)
MICHAEL OKAFOR,
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
) JUDGMENT
)
v.
)
)
)
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
)
DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION, )
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-

The arguments having been presented and fully considered, and in accordance with

1
2

the Court’s January 23, 2018, Order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant

3

State of California Department of Conservation on Plaintiff Michael Okafor’s operative

4

First Amended Complaint,
It is therefore now ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that judgment is

5
6

entered in this action as follows:
1.

7

Plaintiff Michael Okafor shall recover nothing from Defendant State of

8

California Department of Conservation on Plaintiff Michael Okafor’s operative First

9

Amended Complaint, and his claims are dismissed on their merits and with prejudice;
2.

10

Defendant State of California Department of Conservation shall have

11

judgment in its favor on Plaintiff Michael Okafor’s operative First Amended Complaint;

12

and

13
14
15

3.

Defendant shall recover from Plaintiff Michael Okafor costs of suit pursuant

to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

16
17
18

DATED:

April 17, 2018

19
20

__________________________________
CORMAC J. CARNEY

21
22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-