Techmark Software Pty Ltd TA Woolich Racing v. FT ECU Inc
Filing
72
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. See Judgment for more information. (twdb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Proposed and submitted by:
NIXON PEABODY LLP
Shawn G. Hansen (Cal Bar No. 197033)
shansen@nixonpeabody.com
300 So. Grand Avenue, Suite 4100
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: (213) 629-6000
Facsimile: (213) 6296001
KIRTON McCONKIE
Christopher S. Hill (Cal Bar No. 205738)
chill@kmclaw.com
Shawn T. Richards (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
srichards@kmclaw.com
50 East South Temple, Suite 400
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Telephone: (801) 328-3600
Facsimile: (801) 321-4893
JS-6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Techmark Software Pty Ltd
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
TECHMARK SOFTWARE PTY LTD
T/A WOOLICH RACING, an Australian
company,
17
18
19
20
21
CASE NO.: 8:16-cv-00040-JVS-KES
FINAL JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
v.
FT ECU, INC., a California corporation,
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.
22
23
The Court entered an Order on or about March 20, 2017 (the “Order”) denying
24
defendant FT ECU, Inc.’s (“FTECU”) Motion to Reopen (the “Motion to Reopen”) and
25
its two motions to strike (Dkt # 68-1). In the Order, the Court denied the Motion to
26
Reopen on the grounds that, among other things, the parties November 3, 2016 Term
27
Sheet agreement (the “Term Sheet”) is a binding and enforceable settlement agreement
28
between the parties. The Court hereby clarifies its intentions consistent with its rulings
_________________________________
1
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
4837-2517-7411
1
on the record at the hearing on the Motion to Reopen with respect to the denial of the
2
Motion to Reopen. Namely, the Motion to Reopen is denied with respect to FTECU’s
3
request to reopen the case for purposes of litigating the parties’ underlying claims.
4
However, pursuant to its inherent authority, the Local Rules and/or the Federal Rules of
5
Civil Procedure (including but not limited to Rule 60(a)), and for the reasons more fully
6
set forth on the record by the parties’ counsel and the Court at the March 20, 2017
7
hearing on this matter, the Court does hereby (i) clarify the November 18, 2016 Order of
8
Dismissal Upon Settlement of Case (“Dismissal Order”) (Docket # 54) to authorize the
9
reopening of this case for the purpose of entering judgment upon settlement, and (ii)
10
grant the Motion to Reopen in part, but only for the sole and limited purpose of
11
reopening the case to enter a final judgment and dispose of the parties’ claims with
12
prejudice, consistent with the Term Sheet.
13
THEREFORE, for the reasons articulated by the Court in the Order and by the
14
Court and by counsel for plaintiff Techmark Software Pty Ltd. T/A Woolich Racing
15
(“Woolich”) on the record at the March 20, 2017 hearing, all of which is incorporated
16
herein by reference, and for good cause showing, the Court HEREBY ENTERS FINAL
17
JUDGMENT as follows:
18
19
(1) This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this action and over the subject
matter hereof pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1338, and 1367.
20
(2) Service of process was properly made on the parties.
21
(3) The Term Sheet, executed by Woolich and FTECU on November 3, 2016, is a
22
binding and fully enforceable settlement agreement between the parties.
23
(4) Pursuant to the Term Sheet as stipulated and agreed between the parties and this
24
Final Judgment, each of FTECU and Woolich, including all of their parents,
25
subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, stockholders, employees, agents,
26
representatives, successors, assigns and attorneys, and those persons in active
27
concert or participation with any of them, is permanently enjoined from engaging
28
in any of the following activities either directly or indirectly through a third party:
_________________________________
2
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
4837-2517-7411
1
i.
Copying, reverse engineering, duplicating, reproducing, misappropriating,
2
infringing upon, and/or redistributing the software, source code, process,
3
design and/or products belonging to and/or offered by the other party;
4
ii.
Except as may be authorized by the parties’ Term Sheet, accessing, and/or
5
attempting to access, the other party’s software, directly and/or indirectly
6
through a third party; and
7
iii.
Writing any code for the specific purpose of decrypting and/or accessing
8
and/or allowing a third-party to decrypt and/or access the other party’s
9
software and/or source code.
10
11
12
(5) This Final Judgment shall be deemed to have been served upon the parties at the
time of its execution by the Court.
(6) The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to entertain such further
13
proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate to
14
implement and enforce the provisions of this Final Judgment and/or the parties’
15
Term Sheet.
16
(7) This Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties for the purpose of making
17
further orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this
18
Final Judgment and/or the parties’ Term Sheet; the enforcement of either of the
19
foregoing; the punishment of any violations of the foregoing, and for the possible
20
entry of a further judgment.
21
(8) The above-entitled action and all of the claims and/or counterclaims asserted
22
therein, having been fully settled pursuant to the terms of the Term Sheet, and this
23
Final Judgment entered herein, is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Date: March 31, 2017.
26
27
28
____________________________
Honorable James V. Selna
United States District Judge
_________________________________
3
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
4837-2517-7411
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?