Techmark Software Pty Ltd TA Woolich Racing v. FT ECU Inc

Filing 72

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna. See Judgment for more information. (twdb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Proposed and submitted by:

NIXON PEABODY LLP
Shawn G. Hansen (Cal Bar No. 197033)
[e-mail]
300 So. Grand Avenue, Suite 4100
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: (213) 6296001
KIRTON McCONKIE
Christopher S. Hill (Cal Bar No. 205738)
[e-mail]
Shawn T. Richards (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
[e-mail]
50 East South Temple, Suite 400
Salt Lake City, Utah 84111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JS-6

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Techmark Software Pty Ltd

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15
16

TECHMARK SOFTWARE PTY LTD
T/A WOOLICH RACING, an Australian
company,

17
18
19
20
21

CASE NO.: 8:16-cv-00040-JVS-KES
FINAL JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,
v.
FT ECU, INC., a California corporation,
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.

22
23

The Court entered an Order on or about March 20, 2017 (the “Order”) denying

24

defendant FT ECU, Inc.’s (“FTECU”) Motion to Reopen (the “Motion to Reopen”) and

25

its two motions to strike (Dkt # 68-1). In the Order, the Court denied the Motion to

26

Reopen on the grounds that, among other things, the parties November 3, 2016 Term

27

Sheet agreement (the “Term Sheet”) is a binding and enforceable settlement agreement

28

between the parties. The Court hereby clarifies its intentions consistent with its rulings
_________________________________

1

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
4837-2517-7411

1

on the record at the hearing on the Motion to Reopen with respect to the denial of the

2

Motion to Reopen. Namely, the Motion to Reopen is denied with respect to FTECU’s

3

request to reopen the case for purposes of litigating the parties’ underlying claims.

4

However, pursuant to its inherent authority, the Local Rules and/or the Federal Rules of

5

Civil Procedure (including but not limited to Rule 60(a)), and for the reasons more fully

6

set forth on the record by the parties’ counsel and the Court at the March 20, 2017

7

hearing on this matter, the Court does hereby (i) clarify the November 18, 2016 Order of

8

Dismissal Upon Settlement of Case (“Dismissal Order”) (Docket # 54) to authorize the

9

reopening of this case for the purpose of entering judgment upon settlement, and (ii)

10

grant the Motion to Reopen in part, but only for the sole and limited purpose of

11

reopening the case to enter a final judgment and dispose of the parties’ claims with

12

prejudice, consistent with the Term Sheet.

13

THEREFORE, for the reasons articulated by the Court in the Order and by the

14

Court and by counsel for plaintiff Techmark Software Pty Ltd. T/A Woolich Racing

15

(“Woolich”) on the record at the March 20, 2017 hearing, all of which is incorporated

16

herein by reference, and for good cause showing, the Court HEREBY ENTERS FINAL

17

JUDGMENT as follows:

18
19

(1) This Court has jurisdiction over the parties to this action and over the subject
matter hereof pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332, 1338, and 1367.

20

(2) Service of process was properly made on the parties.

21

(3) The Term Sheet, executed by Woolich and FTECU on November 3, 2016, is a

22

binding and fully enforceable settlement agreement between the parties.

23

(4) Pursuant to the Term Sheet as stipulated and agreed between the parties and this

24

Final Judgment, each of FTECU and Woolich, including all of their parents,

25

subsidiaries, affiliates, officers, directors, stockholders, employees, agents,

26

representatives, successors, assigns and attorneys, and those persons in active

27

concert or participation with any of them, is permanently enjoined from engaging

28

in any of the following activities either directly or indirectly through a third party:
_________________________________

2

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
4837-2517-7411

1

i.

Copying, reverse engineering, duplicating, reproducing, misappropriating,

2

infringing upon, and/or redistributing the software, source code, process,

3

design and/or products belonging to and/or offered by the other party;

4

ii.

Except as may be authorized by the parties’ Term Sheet, accessing, and/or

5

attempting to access, the other party’s software, directly and/or indirectly

6

through a third party; and

7

iii.

Writing any code for the specific purpose of decrypting and/or accessing

8

and/or allowing a third-party to decrypt and/or access the other party’s

9

software and/or source code.

10
11
12

(5) This Final Judgment shall be deemed to have been served upon the parties at the
time of its execution by the Court.
(6) The Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action to entertain such further

13

proceedings and to enter such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate to

14

implement and enforce the provisions of this Final Judgment and/or the parties’

15

Term Sheet.

16

(7) This Court shall retain jurisdiction over the parties for the purpose of making

17

further orders necessary or proper for the construction or modification of this

18

Final Judgment and/or the parties’ Term Sheet; the enforcement of either of the

19

foregoing; the punishment of any violations of the foregoing, and for the possible

20

entry of a further judgment.

21

(8) The above-entitled action and all of the claims and/or counterclaims asserted

22

therein, having been fully settled pursuant to the terms of the Term Sheet, and this

23

Final Judgment entered herein, is hereby dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.

24

IT IS SO ORDERED.

25

Date: March 31, 2017.

26
27
28

____________________________
Honorable James V. Selna
United States District Judge
_________________________________

3

[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT
4837-2517-7411