Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. v. Michael W Broderick

Filing 67

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. (mba)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Steven C. Smith, CA State Bar No. 116246 SMITH LC 3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 925 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: (949) 416-5000 Facsimile: (949) 416-5555 Email: ssmith@smith-lc.com John L. Krenn, Esq., MN State Bar No. 12493X GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A. 500 IDS Center 80 S. Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 632-3222 Facsimile: (612) 632-4222 Email: john.krenn@gpmlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 CENTRAL DISTRICT 14 SOUTHERN DIVISION 15 16 UNILOC LUXEMBOURG, S.A., 17 Plaintiff, 18 19 vs. 20 MICHAEL W. BRODERICK, 21 22 23 24 25 Defendant. CASE NO: 8:16-cv-00231-CJC-DFM Assigned to: Judge Cormac J. Carney Dept.: 9B Referred to: Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick Dept.: 6B Complaint Filed: 10/13/15 Trial Date: 6/20/17 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND ORDER 26 27 28 -1STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF 2 RECORD: 3 1. 4 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action is likely to involve 5 production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth below, that this 15 Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information 16 under seal, and the standards set forth in the Local Rules will be applied when a 17 party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 18 2. 19 This action is likely to commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary 20 information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for 21 any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential 22 and proprietary materials and information consist of, among other things, 23 confidential business or financial information, information regarding confidential 24 business practices, or other confidential research, development, or commercial 25 information (including information implicating privacy rights of third parties), 26 27 28 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT information otherwise generally unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of -2STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 information, to facilitate the prompt resolution of disputes over confidentiality of 2 discovery materials, to adequately protect information the parties are entitled to 3 keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses 4 of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial, to address their 5 handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, a protective order 6 7 8 9 10 11 for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 3. 12 13 14 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF PROCEDURE FOR FILING UNDER SEAL The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that 15 this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential 16 information under seal; Local Civil Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must 17 be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission 18 from the court to file material under seal. 19 There is a strong presumption that the public has a right of access to judicial 20 proceedings and records in civil cases. In connection with non-dispositive 21 motions, good cause must be shown to support a filing under seal. See Kamakana 22 v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1176 (9th Cir. 2006), Phillips v. 23 Gen. Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002), Makar-Welbon v. 24 Sony Electrics, Inc., 187 F.R.D. 576, 577 (E.D. Wis. 1999) (even stipulated 25 protective orders require good cause showing), and a specific showing of good 26 27 28 cause or compelling reasons with proper evidentiary support and legal justification, must be made with respect to Protected Material that a party seeks to file under seal. The parties’ mere designation of Disclosure or Discovery Material as -3STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 CONFIDENTIAL does not—without the submission of competent evidence by 2 declaration, establishing that the material sought to be filed under seal qualifies as 3 confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable—constitute good cause. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Further, if a party requests sealing related to a dispositive motion or trial, then compelling reasons, not only good cause, for the sealing must be shown, and the relief sought shall be narrowly tailored to serve the specific interest to be protected. See Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass’n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-79 (9th Cir. 2010). For each item or type of information, document, or thing sought to be filed or introduced under seal in connection with a dispositive motion or trial, the party seeking protection must articulate compelling reasons, supported by specific facts and legal justification, for the requested sealing order. Again, competent evidence supporting the application to file documents under seal must be provided by declaration. Any document that is not confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable 16 in its entirety will not be filed under seal if the confidential portions can be 17 redacted. If documents can be redacted, then a redacted version for public 18 viewing, omitting only the confidential, privileged, or otherwise protectable 19 portions of the document, shall be filed. Any application that seeks to file 20 documents under seal in their entirety should include an explanation of why 21 redaction is not feasible. 22 4. DEFINITIONS 23 4.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 24 25 26 27 28 designation of information or items under this Order. 4.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. -4STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 4.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Counsel of Record, their co-counsel, and their support staff. 4.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information 4 or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 5 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 4.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 4.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this action. 4.7 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 4.8 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 18 party to this action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action 19 and have appeared in this action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a 20 law firm, which has appeared on behalf of that party. 21 4.9 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, 22 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and 23 their support staffs). 24 25 26 27 4.10 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this action. 4.11 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits 28 -5STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or 2 medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 4.12 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 4.13 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 5. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the 15 following information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time 16 of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain after its 17 disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation 18 of this Order, including becoming part of the public record through trial or 19 otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the 20 disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source 21 who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to 22 the Designating Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by 23 the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected 24 Material at trial. 25 26 27 28 6. DURATION Once a case proceeds to trial, information that was designated as confidential or maintained pursuant to this protective order used or introduced as an exhibit at trial becomes public and will be presumptively available to all -6STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 members of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported 2 by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in 3 advance of the trial. See Kamakana, 447 f.3d at 1180-81 (distinguishing “good 4 cause” showing for sealing documents produced in discovery from “compelling 5 reasons” standard when merits-related documents are part of court record). 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Accordingly, the terms of this protective order do not extend beyond the commencement of the trial. 7. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. Mass, indiscriminate or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown to be clearly unjustified 15 or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber 16 the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on 17 other parties) may expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 18 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that 19 it designated for protection do not qualify for protection at all or do not qualify 20 for the level of protection initially asserted, that Designating Party must promptly 21 notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the mistaken designation. 22 7.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided 23 in this Order, or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery 24 Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so 25 designated before the material is disclosed or produced. 26 27 28 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial -7STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 proceedings), that the Producing Party affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to 2 each page that contains protected material. If only a portion of the material on a 3 page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the 4 protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 5 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents or materials available for 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 inspection need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which material it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” to each page that contains Protected Material. 15 If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing 16 Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making 17 appropriate markings in the margins). 18 (b) for testimony given in deposition or in other pretrial or trial 19 proceedings, that the Designating Party identify on the record, before the close of 20 the deposition, hearing, or other proceeding, all protected testimony (including 21 exhibits) and specify the level of protection being asserted. 22 Transcripts (including exhibits) containing Protected Material shall have an 23 obvious legend on the title page that the transcript contains Protected Material, 24 and the title page shall be followed by a list of all pages (including line numbers 25 and exhibit numbers as appropriate) that have been designated as Protected 26 27 Material and the level of protection being asserted by the Designating Party. The Designating Party shall inform the court reporter of these requirements. 28 -8STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary 2 and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent 3 place on the exterior of the container or containers in which the information or 4 item is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the 5 information or item warrant protection, the Producing Party, to the extent 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 practicable, shall identify the protected portion(s) and specify the level of protection being asserted. 7.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 15 8. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 16 8.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a 17 designation of confidentiality at any time. Unless a prompt challenge to a 18 Designating Party’s confidentiality designation is necessary to avoid foreseeable, 19 substantial unfairness, unnecessary economic burdens, or a significant disruption 20 or delay of the litigation, a Party does not waive its right to challenge a 21 confidentiality designation by electing not to mount a challenge promptly after 22 the original designation is disclosed. 23 8.2 Meet and Confer. A Party that elects to initiate a challenge to a 24 Designating Party’s confidentiality designation must do so in good faith and must 25 comply with the meet and confer requirements and procedures set forth in Civil 26 27 Local Rule 37-1 and 37-2. The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on the Designating Party in a manner consistent with Rule 28 -9STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 26(c). Until the Court rules on the challenge, all parties shall continue to afford 2 the material in question the level of protection designated by the Producing Party. 3 9. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 4 9.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the litigation has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 10 below (FINAL DISPOSITION). Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 9.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 16 otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 17 Receiving 18 “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: Party may disclose any information or item designated 19 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this action, 20 as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably 21 necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; 22 23 (b) the Receiving Party, and the officers, directors, and employees of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is necessary for this litigation; 24 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to 25 whom disclosure is necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 26 27 28 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (d) the court and its personnel; (e) court reporters and their staff; - 10 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 (f) professional jury or trial consultants, and Professional Vendors to 2 whom disclosure is necessary for this litigation and who have signed the 3 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 4 (g) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom 5 disclosure is necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and 6 7 8 9 10 11 Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; (h) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a 12 13 custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; or (i) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, 14 mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions. 15 16 10. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED 17 IN OTHER LITIGATION If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court 18 order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or 19 items designated in this Action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must: 20 21 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; and/or 22 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to 23 issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the 24 subpoena or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall 25 include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and (c) cooperate with 26 27 respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. 28 - 11 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served 2 with the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information 3 designated in this action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by 4 the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has 5 obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The Designating Party shall 6 bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court of its 7 confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be construed as 8 authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey a 9 10 11 12 13 14 lawful directive from another court. 11. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non- Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information 15 produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the 16 remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions 17 should be construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional 18 protections. 19 (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to 20 produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is 21 subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s 22 confidential information, then the Party shall: 23 (1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that 24 some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality 25 agreement with a Non-Party; 26 27 28 (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the information requested; and - 12 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 3 (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the NonParty, if requested. (c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court within 14 4 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving 5 Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material. 12. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has 15 disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized 16 under this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) 17 notify in writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its 18 best efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) 19 inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all 20 the terms of this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the 21 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as 22 Exhibit A. 23 13. 24 Without written permission from the Designating Party or a court order 25 secured after appropriate notice to all interested persons, a Party may not file in 26 27 FILING PROTECTED MATERIAL the public record in this action any Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5.1. 28 - 13 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 14. 2 Unless otherwise ordered or agreed in writing by the parties, within 60 3 days after the termination of this action, as defined in paragraph 4 (DURATION), 4 each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or 5 provide a written certification within the 60 day period that all of the Protected 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 FINAL DISPOSITION Material has been destroyed. Such certification shall affirm that all the Protected Material was destroyed that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such 15 archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this 16 Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). 17 15. 18 15.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of 19 MISCELLANEOUS any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 20 15.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 21 Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to 22 disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in 23 this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object 24 on any ground to use in evidence of any material covered by this Protective 25 Order. 26 27 28 15.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Local Civil Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the - 14 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party’s request to file Protected Material 2 under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information 3 in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court. 4 16. 5 6 VIOLATION Any violation of this Order may be punished by appropriate measures including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary sanctions. 7 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. (Signature page and [Proposed] Order follows) Dated: January 23, 2017 SMITH LC 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 /s/ Steven C. Smith STEVEN C. SMITH, CA SBN116246 SMITH LC 3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 925 Irvine, CA 92612 Telephone: (949) 416-5000 Facsimile: (949) 416-5555 Email: ssmith@smith-lc.com John L. Krenn, Esq., MN SBN 12493X GRAY PLANT MOOTY MOOTY & BENNETT, P.A. 500 IDS Center 80 S. Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Telephone: (612) 632-3222 Facsimile: (612) 632-4222 Email: john.krenn@gpmlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. 25 26 27 28 - 15 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Dated: January 23, 2017 KOLETSKY, MANCINI, FELDMAN & MORROW 2 3 /s/ Jason N. Cirlin KOLETSKY, MANCINI, FELDMAN & MORROW 3460 Wilshire Boulevard, Eighth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90010 Telephone: (213) 427-2350 Facsimile: (213) 427-2366 E-mail: jcirlin@kmfm.com 4 5 6 7 8 Brett J. Vottero, Esq. FEIN EMOND &APPLEBAUM P.C. 53 Mulberry Street Springfield, MA 01105 Telephone: (413) 781-5400 Facsimile: (413) 739-0801 Email: bvottero@fpepc.com 9 10 11 12 Attorneys for Defendant Michael W. Broderick 13 14 15 16 17 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 21 DATED: February 1, 2017 _______________________________ Honorable Douglas F. McCormick United States District/Magistrate Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 16 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 EXHIBIT A 2 AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND BY PROTECTIVE ORDER 3 I, ______________________________, have read and fully understand the 4 Stipulated Protective Order (“Protective Order”) in effect in case No. 8:16-cv- 5 00231-CJC-DFM, commonly known as Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A. v. Michael W. 6 Broderick, (the “Lawsuit”). 7 Protective Order and by such other orders as the Court may make regarding 8 discovery of Confidential Information, as defined in the Protective Order. I agree 9 that I will not disclose, either directly or indirectly, any Confidential Information 10 to any person or in any manner not specifically authorized by the Protective 11 Order. I agree that I will not copy or use any Confidential Information except 12 solely for the purposes of the Lawsuit and I will return any Confidential 13 Information and any copies thereof within 60 days of the termination or the final 14 disposition of the Lawsuit as set forth in the Protective Order. I agree that I will 15 not distribute copies of, or provide access to, any Confidential Information to any 16 person, either directly or indirectly, except as set forth in the Protective Order. I 17 hereby consent to the jurisdiction of this Court for the purposes of enforcing this 18 Protective Order. I agree to comply with and be bound by the 19 20 Signature: __________________________ 21 Printed Name: __________________________ 22 Date: __________________________ 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 17 EXHIBIT “A”

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?