Shahrzad Tajmiri v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al
Filing
17
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, in favor of defendants against plaintiff. Given the foregoing ruling, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action. A final JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL is hereby entered against P laintiff and in favor of Defendants. Plaintiff shall take nothing by way of any claims against Defendants, and Defendants are entitled to recover its costs of suit. IT IS SO ORDERED. (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro)
1
2
3
4
5
JS-6
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION
10
SHAHRZAD TAJMIRI, an Individual,
11
12
Case No. 8:16-cv-00247 JVS
(DFMx)
Assigned to Hon. James V. Selna
Plaintiff,
vs.
JUDGMENT
13
J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK,
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, FEDERAL
Complaint filed: October 8, 2015
14
NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION, Removal date: February 11, 2016
Trial date:
Not yet set
15 BARRETT DAFFIN FRAPPIER TREDER
& WEISS, LLP, BARBARA J. CROWL, an
16 Individual, and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT
1
2
On April 27, 2016, this Court granted Defendants JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
3 (hereinafter “Chase”) and Federal National Mortgage Association’s (hereinafter
4 “Fannie Mae”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Shahrzad Tajmiri’s (hereinafter
5 “Plaintiff”) Complaint with prejudice, which Defendant Barrett Daffin Frappier
6 Treder & Weiss, LLP (hereinafter “Barrett”) joined. [Doc. 14.] Defendants Chase,
7 Fannie Mae, and Barrett will be collectively referred to as “Defendants”.
8
Given the foregoing ruling, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are
9 DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE from this action. A final JUDGMENT OF
10 DISMISSAL is hereby entered against Plaintiff and in favor of Defendants. Plaintiff
11 shall take nothing by way of any claims against Defendants, and Defendants are
12 entitled to recover its costs of suit.
13
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
16
Dated: May 16, 2016
The Honorable James V. Selna
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?