Kathryn Marie Morgan v. Carolyn W Colvin
Filing
20
ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs 18 , IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS ($4,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00). (See Order for complete details) (afe)
1
2
3
4
5
James Sung Pi, Calif. Bar No. 188880
LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER
AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C.
60 East 42nd Street Suite 520
New York, NY 10165
Phone (212) 677-6801
Fax (646) 273-2196
Email: fedcourt@binderlawfirm.com
6
7
Attorneys for Plaintiff Kathryn Marie Morgan
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
KATHRYN MARIE MORGAN,
12
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15
16
17
18
CAROLYN W. COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of Social
Security,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No.: 8:16-cv-00305-AS
[PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING
ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE
ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C.
§ 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT
TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920
19
20
21
22
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal
23
Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall
24
be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND
25
DOLLARS ($4,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of
26
FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above-
27
referenced Stipulation, to include the United States Department of the Treasury’s
28
1
1
Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). Any payment
2
shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel.
3
4
5
6
7
/ s / Alka Sagar
Dated: January 17, 2017
Honorable Alka Sagar
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?