Kathryn Marie Morgan v. Carolyn W Colvin

Filing 20

ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. Based upon the parties' Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs 18 , IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND DOLLARS ($4,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00). (See Order for complete details) (afe)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 James Sung Pi, Calif. Bar No. 188880 LAW OFFICES OF HARRY J. BINDER AND CHARLES E. BINDER, P.C. 60 East 42nd Street Suite 520 New York, NY 10165 Phone (212) 677-6801 Fax (646) 273-2196 Email: fedcourt@binderlawfirm.com 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Kathryn Marie Morgan 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 KATHRYN MARIE MORGAN, 12 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. 15 16 17 18 CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No.: 8:16-cv-00305-AS [PROPOSED] ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS, PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 19 20 21 22 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal 23 Access to Justice Act (EAJA) Fees and Costs, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff shall 24 be awarded attorney fees under the EAJA in the amount of FOUR THOUSAND 25 DOLLARS ($4,000.00), and costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, in the amount of 26 FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($400.00), subject to the terms of the above- 27 referenced Stipulation, to include the United States Department of the Treasury’s 28 1 1 Offset Program pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). Any payment 2 shall be delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. 3 4 5 6 7 / s / Alka Sagar Dated: January 17, 2017 Honorable Alka Sagar United States Magistrate Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?