Grazyna Witak v. United States Department of Homeland Security
Filing
39
ORDER GRANTING Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Dismissal of Plaintiff's First amended Complaint and Action with Prejudice 38 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, that (1) Plaintiff First Amended Complaint for Damages and action are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety; (2) Each party shall bear her or its own costs, expenses and attorney's fees; and (3) All Doe defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
EILEEN M. DECKER
United States Attorney
DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, Civil Division
ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE
Assistant United States Attorney
Chief, General Civil Section
DAVID PINCHAS (Cal. Bar No. 130751)
Assistant United States Attorney
Federal Building, Suite 7516
300 North Los Angeles Street
Los Angeles, California 90012
Telephone: (213) 894-2920
Facsimile: (213) 894-7819
E-mail: e-mail@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Defendant
United States of America
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
18
JS-6
SOUTHERN DIVISION
No. CV 16-317 MWF (AFMx)
GRAZYNA WITAK,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
FOR COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT
AND DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S
FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Defendant.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for
Compromise Settlement and Dismissal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for Damages and action are dismissed
with prejudice in their entirety;
2. Each party shall bear her or its own costs, expenses and attorney’s fees; and
3. All Doe defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice.
Dated: April 28, 2017
_________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?