Grazyna Witak v. United States Department of Homeland Security

Filing 39

ORDER GRANTING Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Dismissal of Plaintiff's First amended Complaint and Action with Prejudice 38 by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald, that (1) Plaintiff First Amended Complaint for Damages and action are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety; (2) Each party shall bear her or its own costs, expenses and attorney's fees; and (3) All Doe defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 EILEEN M. DECKER United States Attorney DOROTHY A. SCHOUTEN Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Civil Division ROBYN-MARIE LYON MONTELEONE Assistant United States Attorney Chief, General Civil Section DAVID PINCHAS (Cal. Bar No. 130751) Assistant United States Attorney Federal Building, Suite 7516 300 North Los Angeles Street Los Angeles, California 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-2920 Facsimile: (213) 894-7819 E-mail: e-mail@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Defendant United States of America 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 16 17 18 JS-6 SOUTHERN DIVISION No. CV 16-317 MWF (AFMx) GRAZYNA WITAK, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND ACTION WITH PREJUDICE Defendant. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for Pursuant to the parties’ Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Dismissal, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint for Damages and action are dismissed with prejudice in their entirety; 2. Each party shall bear her or its own costs, expenses and attorney’s fees; and 3. All Doe defendants are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Dated: April 28, 2017 _________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?