Nicholas Patrick v. Costa Mesa Police Dept. et al
Filing
189
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. no later than March 21, 2019, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as to defendant Hahn for failure to prosecute and serve him. (See document for details.) (sbou)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES-GENERAL
Case No.: SA CV 16-318-DMG (PLA)
Title:
Date: February 28, 2019
Nicholas Patrick v. Costa Mesa Police Dep’t, et al.
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE
PAUL L. ABRAMS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Christianna Howard
Deputy Clerk
N/A
Court Reporter / Recorder
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR PLAINTIFF:
ATTORNEYS PRESENT FOR DEFENDANT(S):
NONE
PROCEEDINGS:
N/A
Tape No.
NONE
(IN CHAMBERS)
On January 3, 2019, the Court ordered the United States Marshal to proceed with service of process of the
summons and Fifth Amended Complaint on multiple defendants in this action, including defendant Sergeant L.
Hahn. The marshal was informed that Sergeant Hahn no longer works for the Orange County Sheriff’s
Department (ECF No. 177). He thus remains unserved. Accordingly, no later than March 21, 2019, plaintiff
is ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed as to defendant Hahn for failure to prosecute
and serve him. Filing by plaintiff of a current location where defendant Hahn can be served by the marshal will
constitute compliance with this Order. Failure by plaintiff to respond to this Order, or to show cause why
this action should not be dismissed as to defendant Hahn, will result in dismissal as to defendant Hahn.
cc:
Nicholas Patrick, pro se
Counsel of Record
Initials of Deputy Clerk
CV-90 (10/08)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
ch
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?