Brad W. King v. U. S. Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 111

ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, re Stipulation of Dismissal of Action With Prejudice. 110 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, including all causes of action, be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys fees. (es)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION 10 ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) U.S. BANK, N.A., a subsidiary of U.S. BANCORP, a Delaware corporation, ) ) and ) DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) 11 BRAD W. KING, CASE NO: 8:16-cv-00465-DOC-KESx 12 ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Pursuant to the parties’ “Stipulation of Dismissal of Action with Prejudice,” and 20 good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, including 21 all causes of action, be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Each 22 party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 23 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: May 19, 2017 ______________________________ The Honorable David O. Carter Judge of the United States District Court, Central District of California 28 1 Order re Stipulation of Dismissal of Action with Prejudice

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?