Brad W. King v. U. S. Bank, N.A. et al
Filing
111
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, re Stipulation of Dismissal of Action With Prejudice. 110 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, including all causes of action, be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Each party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys fees. (es)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SOUTHERN DIVISION
10
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
U.S. BANK, N.A., a subsidiary of
U.S. BANCORP, a Delaware corporation, )
)
and
)
DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
11 BRAD W. KING,
CASE NO: 8:16-cv-00465-DOC-KESx
12
ORDER RE
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF
ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Pursuant to the parties’ “Stipulation of Dismissal of Action with Prejudice,” and
20 good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action, including
21 all causes of action, be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. Each
22 party shall bear his or its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
23
24
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
May 19, 2017
______________________________
The Honorable David O. Carter
Judge of the United States District Court,
Central District of California
28
1
Order re Stipulation of Dismissal of Action with Prejudice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?