United States of America v. Terrance J. Shannon

Filing 21

ORDER to Finding Respondent in Contempt by Judge David O. Carter. For good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED that Respondent shall pay a daily fine to the Clerk of the Court in the amount of $500 for each day Respondent is not in substantial c ompliance with the Court's June 1, 2016 Order, for the period beginning the date this order is entered through June 5, 2016. Should Respondent substantially comply, any and all accrued fines incurred pursuant to this Order will be purged. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. Respondent shall appear before United States District Judge David O. Carter in Courtroom 9D, Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 411 West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, California, on June 12, 2017 at 8:30 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this Court's June 1, 2016 Order. This hearing will be vacated if the Court is notified before June 5, 2017 that Respondent has substantially complied with the Court's June 1, 2016 Order. (see document for details). (dro)

Download PDF
7 SANDRA R. BROWN Acting United States Attorney THOMAS D. COKER Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division CHARLES PARKER (Cal. Bar No. 283078) Assistant United States Attorney 300 N. Los Angeles Street Federal Building, Suite 7211 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Telephone: (213) 894-2740 Facsimile: (213) 894-0115 Email: charles.parker@usdoj.gov 8 Attorneys for the United States of America 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SOUTHERN DIVISION 12 Petitioner, 13 14 15 Case No. 8:16-cv-0607-DOC (DFMx) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER TO FINDING RESPONDENT IN CONTEMPT v. TERRANCE J. SHANNON, 16 Respondent. 17 18 On April 17, 2017, the Court held an order to show cause hearing to determine 19 why Respondent Terrance Shannon (“Respondent”) should not be found in contempt 20 of the Court’s June 1, 2016 Order enforcing Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) 21 summonses. [Dkt. No. 10.] For good cause shown, it is hereby 22 ORDERED that Respondent shall pay a daily fine to the Clerk of the Court in 23 the amount of $500 for each day Respondent is not in substantial compliance with the 24 Court’s June 1, 2016 Order, for the period beginning the date this order is entered 25 through June 5, 2016. Should Respondent substantially comply, any and all accrued 26 fines incurred pursuant to this Order will be purged. 27 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 28 1. Respondent shall appear before United States District Judge David O. 1 1 Carter in Courtroom 9D, Ronald Reagan Federal Building and United States 2 Courthouse, 411 West Fourth Street, Santa Ana, California, on June 12, 2017 at 8:30 3 a.m., to show cause why he should not be held in contempt of this Court’s June 1, 4 2016 Order. This hearing will be vacated if the Court is notified before June 5, 2017 5 that Respondent has substantially complied with the Court’s June 1, 2016 Order. 6 2. A copy of this Order shall be served by the government upon Respondent 7 in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b) as soon as practicable after this Order is served 8 upon counsel for the United States. Proof of any service done pursuant to the 9 preceding sentence shall be filed with the Clerk within three (3) days of service. 10 11 12 3. The United States shall promptly file a notice with the Court if Respondent complies with the June 1, 2016 Order. The Court ADMONISHES Respondent that he is subject to additional 13 sanctions, including imprisonment, if Respondent continues to disobey and/or 14 fails to comply with the Court’s June 1, 2016 Order. 15 16 17 DATED: April 18, 2017 DAVID O. CARTER United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 Respectfully presented, /s/ CHARLES PARKER Assistant United States Attorney Attorney for the United States 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?