John Ho v. SSK Investment LLC
Filing
24
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, Judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of $9,465.08. Defendant is enjoined to install an accessible parking space compliant with theAmericans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, including but not limited to installing a fully compliant access aisle; That the action be, and is hereby dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lwag)
1
2
3
4
5
PAMELA TSAO (SBN 266734)
ASCENSION LAW GROUP
2030 E. 4th Street
Suite 205
Santa Ana, CA 92705
PH: 714.783.4220
FAX: 888.505.1033
Pamela.Tsao@ascensionlawgroup.com
JS-6
Attorneys for Plaintiff JOHN HO
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
JOHN HO, an individual
) Case No.: 8:16-cv-629-DOC-JCG
)
)
Plaintiff,
) JUDGMENT
)
vs.
)
SSK INVESTMENT, LLC, a California )
)
limited liability company
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
) [Hon David O. Carter presiding]
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
25
26
27
28
JUDGMENT
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
On September 14, 2016 the Court entered an order granting plaintiff John Ho’s
(“Plaintiff”) Application for Default Judgment titled “Motion for Default Judgment”
(“Application”) against SSK INVESTMENT, LLC, a California limited liability
company (“Defendant”). Consequently,
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED
Judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff and against Defendant in the amount of
$9,465.08.
Defendant is enjoined to install an accessible parking space compliant with the
Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, including but not limited to
installing a fully compliant access aisle;
That the action be, and is hereby dismissed.
12
13
14
DATED: October 11, 2016
___________________________
DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
JUDGMENT
(CASE NO. 8:16-CV-629-DOC-JCG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?