Ricardo Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 29

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation 27 . IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that defendants' MOTION to Dismiss 15 is granted and the Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. (See document for further details.) (iva)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 RICARDO RODRIGUEZ, JR., Plaintiff, 15 16 vs. 17 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, et al., 18 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. SACV 16-00674-JVS (DTB) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Complaint, all the 21 records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States 22 Magistrate Judge. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed 23 herein. The Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and 24 recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. 25 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is granted 26 and the Complaint is dismissed with leave to amend. If plaintiff still desires to pursue 27 this action, he is hereby ORDERED to file a First Amended Complaint within thirty 28 (30) days of the date of this Order. If plaintiff chooses to file a First Amended 1 1 Complaint, it should bear the docket number assigned in this case; be labeled “First 2 Amended Complaint”; and be complete in and of itself without reference to the 3 Complaint, or any other pleading, attachment, or document. 4 5 6 7 Dated: March 29, 2017 8 _______________________________ JAMES V. SELNA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?