Ricardo Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles et al
Filing
67
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 12/18/2019. (dc)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Case No.
8:16-cv-00674-JVS (SHK)
Date: December 4, 2019
Title: Ricardo Rodriguez v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
Present: The Honorable Shashi H. Kewalramani, United States Magistrate Judge
D. Castellanos
Not Reported
Deputy Clerk
Court Reporter
Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
None Present
None Present
Proceedings (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
On September 25, 2019, the Court denied Defendant’s motion to dismiss claims one
through three of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”) but granted Defendant’s
motion to dismiss claims four and five, with leave to amend. Consequently, if Plaintiff wanted to
proceed with the claims four and five in the SAC, he was given the opportunity to amend his
pleading and file a Third Amended Complaint (“TAC”) on before October 10, 2019. ECF No.
64, 66. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a TAC within the allotted time, nor has he requested an
extension of time within which to do so.
Accordingly, on or before December 18, 2019 Plaintiff is ORDERED to either (a) advise
the Court that he does not desire to pursue the claims set forth in claims four and five of his
Second Amended Complaint; (b) if Plaintiff does desire to pursue the claims set forth in claims
four and five, show good cause in writing, if any exists, why Plaintiff has not timely filed with the
Court his TAC; or (c) file a TAC amending the allegations related to claims four and five in the
SAC. If Plaintiff does not advise the Court of his position regarding claims four and five in the
SAC, the matter will proceed as to claims one through three in the SAC.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Page 1 of 1
CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
Initials of Deputy Clerk DC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?