Myunghwan Chang v. Paul Park et al
Filing
31
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS UNOPPOSED MOTIONS TO DISMISS 23 , 25 . Plaintiffs complaint is dismissed by Judge Dean D. Pregerson (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lc)
1
2
O
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MYUNGHWAN CHANG,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
PAUL PARK, an individual;
KIM, SHAPIRO, PARK & LEE, a
California Professional Law
Corporation,
16
Defendants.
17
___________________________
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 16-00721 DDP (DFMx)
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
UNOPPOSED MOTIONS TO DISMISS
[Dkt. Nos. 23, 25]
18
19
Defendants in this case each filed a Motion to Dismiss, both
20
of which are presently before the court.
21
either motion.
22
adopts the following Order.
Plaintiff has not opposed
Accordingly, the court GRANTS the motions and
23
Central District of California Local Rule 7-9 requires an
24
opposing party to file an opposition to any motion at least twenty-
25
one (21) days prior to the date designated for hearing the motion.
26
C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-9.
27
“[t]he failure to file any required document, or the failure to
28
file it within the deadline, may be deemed consent to the granting
Additionally, Local Rule 7-12 provides that
or denial of the motion.”
C.D. CAL. L.R. 7-12.
1
Defendant Kim, Shapiro, Park, & Lee’s motion was filed on June
2
24, 2016.
3
Both motions were noticed for hearing on July 25, 2016.
4
Plaintiff’s oppositions were therefore due by July 11, 2016.
5
the date of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed an opposition to
6
either motion, or any other filing that could be construed as a
7
request for a continuance.
8
Plaintiff’s failure to oppose as consent to granting the motions to
9
dismiss, and GRANTS the motions.
10
Defendant Park’s motion was filed on June 25, 2016.
As of
Accordingly, the court deems
Plaintiff’s Complaint is
DISMISSED.
11
12
13
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
16
17
Dated: July 21, 2016
DEAN D. PREGERSON
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?