Federal Trade Commission v. Kutzner et al
Filing
158
PROTECTIVE ORDER AND ORDER GRANTING PARTIES ACCESS TO ALL DOCUMENTS HELD BY THE RECEIVER by Magistrate Judge Alexander F. MacKinnon. Re Stipulation for Protective Order 157 . (ib)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
No. 8:16-cv-00999-BRO (AFMx)
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION,
[PROPOSED] STIPULATED
PROTECTIVE ORDER AND
ORDER GRANTING PARTIES
ACCESS TO ALL DOCUMENTS
HELD BY THE RECEIVER
Plaintiff,
v.
DAMIAN KUTZNER, et al.,
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiff, Federal Trade Commission (“FTC” or “Commission”), and
Defendants Damian Kutzner (“Kutzner”), Jeremy Foti (“Foti”), Vito Torchia
(“Torchia”), Jonathan Tarkowski (“Tarkowski”), Charles Marshall (“Marshall”),
and Geoffrey Broderick (“Broderick”) (listed defendants, collectively,
“Stipulating Defendants”) all stipulate to this order (“Order”) granting them access
to all documents held by the Receiver and placing certain restrictions on the use of
those and other documents. Defendants Advantis Law P.C. (“Advantis Law”),
Advantis Law Group P.C. (“Advantis Law Group”), Brookstone Law P.C.
California (“Brookstone California”), and Brookstone Law P.C. Nevada
(“Brookstone Nevada”) are not parties to the stipulation or Order because they
have defaulted in this action by failing to file timely Answers (DE 113).
27
28
1
Good cause exists for this Order. First, documents held by Receiver Thomas
1
2
W. McNamara (“Receivership Materials”) contain information relevant to this
3
litigation concerning the business practices of Advantis Law, Advantis Law Group,
4
Brookstone California, and Brookstone Nevada (hereinafter “Receivership
5
Entities”). Second, there is good cause for placing restrictions on the use of the
6
Receivership Materials and other documents obtained in this case. The
7
Receivership Materials are likely to include correspondence from the clients of the
8
Receivership Entities concerning the nature or existence of legal services those
9
clients were seeking. Although there is dispute concerning the existence of an
10
attorney-client privilege, restricting the use of Receivership Materials will protect
11
these former clients who may have disclosed personal or financial information to
12
the Receivership Entities under the impression that the information would be
13
subject to an attorney-client privilege.1 Furthermore, for the other documents
14
identified below, the restricted use is limited to those documents containing
15
sensitive personal information and trade secrets, the unfettered disclosure of which
16
to third parties can result in invasions of individuals’ privacy and disclosure of
17
otherwise protected information. In particular, it is likely that the litigation will
18
involve the exchange of the sensitive personal information of the numerous former
19
clients of the Receivership Entities. Entering this Order will ensure that this
20
information can be exchanged without concern that it will be used improperly or
21
otherwise disclosed outside of the litigation.
Therefore, good cause having been shown, the Court enters this stipulated
22
23
order, which includes a protective order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c).
24
IT IS ORDERED:
25
26
27
1
In a related action, Judge Carter has held that the Receivership Materials are
not subject to an attorney-client privilege. D.E. 98
28
2
1
1.
The Receiver shall allow the FTC, Stipulating Defendants, and their
2
representatives reasonable access to the Receivership Materials. The Receiver has
3
released certain Receivership Materials to the FTC for safekeeping. For these
4
materials, the FTC shall control its own access and give the Stipulating Defendants
5
reasonable access. The purpose of the access to Receivership Materials shall be to
6
inspect, inventory, and copy any Receivership Materials. Provided that: (1) for
7
those Receivership Materials still in the possession of the Receiver, the
8
Receivership Materials are not to be removed from the Receivership’s possession
9
without the permission of the Receiver, and the Receiver shall have the discretion
10
to determine the time, manner, and reasonable conditions of such access; and (2)
11
for those Receivership Materials in the possession of the FTC, the Receivership
12
Materials are not removed from the FTC’s possession without the permission of
13
both the Receiver and the FTC, and the FTC shall have the discretion to determine
14
the time, manner, and reasonable conditions of such access. To access the
15
Receivership Materials in the FTC’s possession, Stipulating Defendants shall
16
contact counsel for the FTC, Benjamin Theisman or Gregory Madden. The FTC
17
and Stipulating Defendants shall have access to the Receivership Materials without
18
regard to any claim of attorney-client privilege held by a Receivership Entity
19
client. Provided, further, that the Receivership Materials obtained by the Receiver
20
pursuant to the Temporary Restraining Order with Appointment of Temporary
21
Receiver as to Defendant Jeremy Foti, DE 130, and the Preliminary Injunction
22
with Appointment of Receiver as to Defendant Jeremy Foti (“Foti Receivership
23
PI”), DE 153, shall only be made available to the FTC and the Stipulating Parties
24
subject to the Receiver’s obligation to create and maintain an attorney-client
25
privilege log to ensure that privileged materials taken from Defendant Foti’s
26
residence are not provided to any other party, inadvertently or otherwise, pursuant
27
to Section IV.S.6 of the Foti Receivership PI.
28
3
1
2.
An attorney for the FTC or Stipulating Defendants, or an individual
2
defendant if unrepresented, marking material as “Confidential Material” certifies in
3
good faith that it contains: (a) sensitive personal information, or (b) trade secret(s)
4
or other confidential research, development, or commercial information.
5
3.
6
Receiver reflecting communications from or to a former Receivership Entity client
7
concerning legal advice or information offered to assist in the provision of legal
8
advice. Although the Receiver shall not be obligated to mark such documents as
9
Confidential Material before providing them to the Stipulating Parties, the
10
Stipulating Parties must treat such documents as Confidential Material whether or
11
not marked.
12
4.
13
sensitive health-related data including medical records; (c) biometric identifier; or
14
(d) any one or more of the following when combined with an individual’s name,
15
address, or phone number: (i) date of birth, (ii) driver’s license or other state
16
identification number, or a foreign equivalent, (iii) military identification number,
17
(iv) passport number, (v) financial institution account number, (vi) credit or debit
18
card number; or (e) other sensitive information relating to an individual entitled to
19
confidential status under applicable law, by order of this Court, or by agreement of
20
the parties. Provided that for items designated under (e), the designating party
21
identifies the specific applicable law, order, or agreement entitling such
22
information to confidential status at the time of its designation.
23
5.
“Confidential Material” shall also include all documents obtained from the
“Sensitive Personal Information” means any: (a) Social Security number; (b)
Confidential Material must be designated as follows:
24
a.
Mark paper materials “CONFIDENTIAL.” If paper material is only
25
confidential in part, mark only the portions of the material that are
26
confidential.
27
b.
Mark electronic materials “CONFIDENTIAL” by marking each
28
4
1
electronic page or subpart that is confidential. If the electronic material
2
cannot be marked by page or subpart, the designee shall meet and confer
3
with the recipient to determine a means to delineate the confidential
4
material. Also, mark the electronic storage medium, as well as any
5
electronic file and folder name “CONFIDENTIAL.”
6
c.
7
days of receipt of the final transcript by identifying the specific page(s) and
8
line number(s) that are confidential. If testimony is identified as confidential
9
during a deposition, absent agreement on the scope of confidentiality, the
10
entire transcript shall be treated as confidential until the time for designation
11
expires.
Designate deposition transcripts as Confidential Material within 10
12
6.
An inadvertent failure to mark Confidential Material prior to disclosure does
13
not preclude a subsequent designation, but no prior disclosure of newly designated
14
Confidential Material by a recipient shall violate this Order.
15
7.
16
as Confidential Material. In particular, within ten (10) days of a written objection
17
to the designation of Confidential Material, the designating party must meet and
18
confer with the other party and serve its portion of the Local Rule 37-2 Joint
19
Stipulation. The burden of proving that the designation is proper is on the
20
designating party. Failure to abide by this provision terminates confidential
21
treatment.
22
8.
Local Rule 37 shall govern all disputes regarding the marking of documents
Confidential Material may only be disclosed to:
23
a.
the Court and court personnel;
24
b.
any Receiver appointed in this matter;
25
c.
the parties’ outside counsel and designated employees only to the
26
extent necessary to assist in the litigation and, for unrepresented parties, the
27
party;
28
5
1
d.
experts and contractors consulted or retained by the parties or counsel,
2
and their employees, provided that they agree in writing to abide by this
3
protective order or execute FTC Form X33-Nondisclosure Agreement for
4
Contractors;
5
e.
6
participated in a communication that is the subject of the Confidential
7
Material; and
8
f.
any person who had prior access to the Confidential Material or
witnesses and their counsel.
9
9.
Disclosure of Confidential Material to any person described in Paragraph 8
10
shall be only for the purposes of the preparation and hearing of this proceeding, or
11
any appeal, therefrom, and for no other purpose whatsoever. Provided, however,
12
that the Commission may, subject to taking appropriate steps to preserve the
13
confidentiality of such material, use or disclose Confidential Material as provided
14
by its Rules of Practice; sections 6 and 21 of the Federal Trade Commission Act;
15
with any state or federal agency for law enforcement purposes in accordance with
16
Commission procedures; or any other legal obligation imposed upon the
17
Commission.
18
10.
19
entitle them to file documents marked as Confidential Material under seal; Local
20
Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that
21
will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under
22
seal.
23
11.
24
Material at trial. Rather, the use of such information shall be governed by the
25
orders of the trial judge.
26
12.
27
assist counsel in the preparation of this action shall destroy or return all
The FTC and Stipulating Defendants acknowledge that this Order does not
This Order does not govern the use of Confidential Material or Receivership
At the conclusion of this case, any consultant or other person retained to
28
6
1
Confidential Materials and any other materials containing confidential information.
2
All Confidential Materials held by the parties shall be destroyed or returned to the
3
designee, except that the FTC shall retain, return, or destroy Confidential Materials
4
in accordance with Rule 4.12 of the FTC’s Rules of Practice.
5
13.
6
case absent further order of the Court.
This Order continues to govern Confidential Material after conclusion of the
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED, this 29th day of November, 2016.
9
10
11
12
___________________________________________
ALEXANDER F. MacKINNON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?