Scheerlinck v. Orange County Sheriff's Dept. et al

Filing 128

ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION RE: COUNTY OF ORANGE'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF NO. 107 ) by Judge James V. Selna for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 119 . Defendant County of Orange's Motion to Dismiss is granted. Plaintiff's claims against the County of Orange shall be dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice for failure to state a claim. County of Orange terminated. (sbou)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SOUTHERN DIVISION

10
11

PETER SCHEERLINCK,

12
13
14
15

Plaintiff,
v.
ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT.,
et al.,
Defendants.

16

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. SA CV 16-1012-JVS (PLA)
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE
JUDGE’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION RE: COUNTY OF
ORANGE'S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF
NO. 107)

17

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Fifth Amended Complaint, all the

18

records and files herein, and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation Re: County of

19

Orange's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 107). The Court accepts the recommendations of the

20

Magistrate Judge.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
2

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

3

1.

The Report and Recommendation is accepted.

4

2.

Defendant County of Orange's Motion to Dismiss is granted.

5

3.

Plaintiff's claims against the County of Orange shall be dismissed without leave to

6

amend and with prejudice for failure to state a claim.

7
8
9

DATED: February 7, 2019

___________________________________
HONORABLE JAMES V. SELNA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2