Commercial Services Building Inc et al v. Karl T. Anderson

Filing 8

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE PROSECUTION by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. On April 27, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court entered a judgment in favor of Karl Anderson. (ECF No. 1 .) On July 7, 2016, Douglas Patrick filed a notice of appeal. (Id.) However, Patric k did not file all of the appellate documents necessary for the Court to conduct a review of the Bankruptcy Court's decision. (See ECF No. 6 .) Therefore, Patrick is ordered to show cause by February 20, 2017, why the remaining appellate documents have not been filed with the Court. Patrick's failure to timely comply with this order will result in the dismissal of his appeal without further notice. IT IS SO ORDERED. (jy)

Download PDF
1 O 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 United States District Court Central District of California 9 10 11 12 13 IN RE COMMERCIAL SERVICES BUILDING INC. ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE 14 15 DOUGLAS PATRICK, Appellant, 16 v. 17 18 KARL T. ANDERSON, Appellee. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No. 8:16-CV-01260-ODW /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// /// PROSECUTION 1 On April 27, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court entered a judgment in favor of Karl 2 Anderson. (ECF No. 1.) On July 7, 2016, Douglas Patrick filed a notice of appeal. 3 (Id.) However, Patrick did not file all of the appellate documents necessary for the 4 Court to conduct a review of the Bankruptcy Court’s decision. (See ECF No. 6.) 5 Therefore, Patrick is ordered to show cause by February 20, 2017, why the remaining 6 appellate documents have not been filed with the Court. Patrick’s failure to timely 7 comply with this order will result in the dismissal of his appeal without further notice. 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. February 7, 2016 11 12 13 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?