Prime Healthcare La Palma, LLC v. SCAN Health Plan et al

Filing 27

JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's Complaint against SCAN is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff's ability to pursue its Complaint after exhausting the Medicare Act's administrative remedies. The Court hereby enters final judgment for SCAN. (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SOUTHERN DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

PRIME HEALTHCARE LA PALMA,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company doing business as LA PALMA
INTERCOMMUNITY HOSPITAL,
v.

Plaintiff,

SCAN HEALTH PLAN, and DOES 1
through 100, inclusive,

Case No. 8:16-cv-01284-DFM
JUDGMENT
Complaint Filed: June 2, 2016

Hon. Douglas F. McCormick

Defendants.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

JUDGMENT;
CASE NO. 8:16-CV-01284-DFM

1

The Motion to Dismiss filed by SCAN Health Plan (“SCAN”) regarding

2

Plaintiff Prime Healthcare La Palma, LLC (“Plaintiff”) Complaint came before the

3

Court for hearing on September 27, 2016 in Courtroom 6B of the above-entitled

4

Court, the Honorable Douglas F. McCormick presiding. Sepand Akhavanhaidary

5

appeared on behalf of Plaintiff. Peter Roan and Harsh P. Parikh of Crowell &

6

Moring LLP appeared on behalf of SCAN. Prior to the hearing, the Court issued a

7

tentative order granting SCAN’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter

8

jurisdiction based on Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies. On

9

September 27, 2016, the Court adopted its tentative order.

10

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff’s Complaint

11

against SCAN is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiff’s ability to pursue its

12

Complaint after exhausting the Medicare Act’s administrative remedies. The Court

13

hereby enters final judgment for SCAN.

14
15

Dated: October 13, 2016
Hon. Douglas F. McCormick
United States Magistrate Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
C ROWELL
& M ORING LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

-2-

JUDGMENT;
CASE NO. 8:16-CV-01284-DFM