Styles for Less, Inc. v. RSC Insurance Brokerage, Inc. et al

Filing 112

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 111 by Judge James V. Selna. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

CHRISTOPHER S. MAILE, ESQ.; SBN 117998
GERALD M. SIEGEL, ESQ.; SBN 75037
SOOJIN KANG, ESQ.; SBN 219738
THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Fl.
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone] fax
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

JS-6

Attorneys for Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff,
RSC INSURANCE BROKERAGE, INC. d/b/a RSC OF CALIFORNIA
INSURANCE BROKERAGE, INC.

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SOUTHERN DIVISION

12
13

STYLES FOR LESS, INC., a
corporation,

Case No.: 8:16-cv-01324-JVS-JCG

14

Plaintiff,
15

v.

ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION
WITH PREJUDICE

16

RSC INSURANCE BROKERAGE,
INC. d/b/a RISK STRATEGIES
COMPANY, INC., a corporation,
18 WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES
INSURANCE COMPANY, a
19 corporation, RSUI Indemnity
Company, a corporation, and DOES 1
20 through 100, inclusive,
17

Defendants.

21

RSC INSURANCE BROKERAGE,
INC. d/b/a RSC OF CALIFORNIA
23 INSURANCE BROKERAGE, INC.
22

24
25

v.

Third-Party Plaintiff,

SOCIUS INSURANCE SERVICES,
INC., a corporation, and BLANK
ROME LLP, a limited liability
27 partnership.
26

28

Third-Party Defendants.

-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE
8:16-cv-01324-JVS-JCG

1

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, the above-captioned action in its

2

entirety, including all parties and third-party actions, is hereby dismissed with

3

prejudice, each party to bear its own attorneys’ fees, expenses, and costs.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8
9

THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221

10

Dated: May 17, 2017

______________________________
The Honorable James V. Selna
United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

1

PROOF OF SERVICE

2

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES

3

1. At the time of service I was at least 18 years of age and not a party to this legal
action.

4
5
6

2. My business address is 15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor, Sherman Oaks,
CA 91403.
3. I served copies of the following documents (specify the exact title of each
document served):

7
8
9

THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

4. I served the documents listed above in item 3 on the following persons at the
addresses listed:
David P. Schack, Esq.
[e-mail]
Devin J. Stone, Esq.
[e-mail]
Matthew B. O’Hanlon, Esq.
[e-mail]
BARNES & THORNBURG, LLP
2029 Century Park East, Suite 300
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
STYLES FOR LESS, INC.

Scott N. Godes, Esq.
[e-mail]
BARNES AND THORNBURG LLP
1717 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20006-4623
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
STYLES FOR LESS, INC.

Carrie M. Raver, Esq.
[e-mail]
BARNES AND THORNBURG LLP
110 E. Wayne St., Ste. 600
Fort Wayne, IN 46802
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
STYLES FOR LESS, INC.

Douglas A. Pettit, Esq.
[e-mail]
Matthew C. Smith, Esq.
[e-mail]
PETTIT KOHN INGRASSIA &
LUTZ PC
11622 El Camino Real, Ste. 300
San Diego, CA 92130
[phone]; Fax [phone]
Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant,
SOCIUS INSURANCE SERVICES,
INC.

David A. Tartaglio, Esq.
[e-mail]
Teresa Cho, Esq.
[e-mail]
MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT
LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
One Wilshire Blvd, Ste. 2000
Los Angeles, CA 90017-3383

Desmond J. Hinds, Esq.
[e-mail]
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
11601 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 800
Los Angeles, CA 90025
[phone]; Fax [phone]
Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant,

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant RSUI
INDEMNITY COMPANY

BLANK ROME, LLP

Philip Touitou, Esq.
[e-mail]
HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP
800 Third Ave., 13th Fl.
New York, NY 10022
[phone]; Fax [phone]
Attorneys for Third-Party Defendant,
BLANK ROME, LLP

Edward P. Gibbons, Esq.
[e-mail]
Arthur J. McColgan, II
WALKER WILCOX MATOUSEK
LLP
1 North Franklin Street, Suite 3200
Chicago, IL 60606
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant,
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES
INSURANCE COMPANY

8
9

THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221

10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Larry J. Liu, Esq.
[e-mail]

DAVID H. PIERCE & ASSOCIATES
PC
14724 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 910
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant,
WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES
INSURANCE COMPANY
5. a.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

b.

By personal service. I personally delivered the documents on the date
shown below to the persons at the addresses listed above in item 4. (1)
For a party represented by an attorney, delivery was made to the
attorney or at the attorney's office by leaving the documents in an
envelope or package clearly labeled to identify the attorney being served
with a receptionist or an individual in charge of the office. (2) For a
party delivery was made to the party or by leaving the documents at the
party's residence between the hours of eight in the morning and six in
the evening with some person not less than 18 years of age.
By United States mail. I enclosed the documents in a sealed envelope
or package addressed to the persons at the addresses in item 4 and
(specify one):
(1)

deposited the sealed envelope with the United States Postal
Service, with the postage fully prepaid on the date shown
below, or

25
26
27
28
-4[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE

(2)

1
2
3
4

placed the envelope for collection and mailing on the date
shown below, following our ordinary business practices. I am
readily familiar with this business's practice for collecting and
processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that
correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is
deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United
States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully
prepaid.

5

I am a resident or employed in the county where the mailing occurred.
The envelope or package was placed in the mail at Sherman Oaks,
California.

6
7

c.

By overnight delivery. I enclosed the documents on the date shown
below in an envelope or package provided by an overnight delivery
carrier and addressed to the person at the addresses in item 4. I placed the
envelope or package for collection and overnight delivery at an office or a
regularly utilized drop box of the overnight delivery carrier.

d.

By fax transmission. Based on an agreement of the parties to accept
service by fax transmission, I faxed the documents on the date shown
below to the fax numbers of the persons listed in item 4. No error was
reported by the fax machine that I used. A copy of the fax transmission,
which I printed out, is attached to my file copy.

e.

By e-mail or electronic transmission. Based on an agreement of the
parties to accept service by e-mail or electronic transmission, I caused
all of the pages of the above-entitled document(s) to be electronically
filed and served on designated recipients through the Electronic Case
Filing system for the above-entitled case. The file transmission was
reported as successful and a copy of the Electronic Case Filing Receipt
will be maintained with the original document(s) in our office.

8
9

THARPE & HOWELL, LLP
15250 Ventura Boulevard, Ninth Floor
Sherman Oaks, California 91403-3221

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

6. I served the documents by the means described in item 5 on (date): 08/ /16
I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of this bar of this court, at
whose direction the service was made.

20
21

8/ /16
DATE

Amy Eivazian
(TYPE OR PRINT NAME)

(SIGNATURE OF DECLARANT)

22
I:\27000-000\27818\PLEADINGS\ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL - ENTIRE ACTION.DOCX

23
24
25
26
27
28
-5[PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION WITH
PREJUDICE