Rodriguez-Marrero et al v. Toyota Motor Company et al

Filing 19

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii)) 18 by Judge James V. Selna. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (es)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

Vincent Galvin (SBN# 104448)
[e-mail]
BOWMAN AND BROOKE LLP
1741 Technology Drive, Suite 200
San Jose, CA 95110
Telephone No.: [phone]
Fax No.: [phone]

Michelle Annet Ramos-Jimenez
LUIS RAFAEL RIVERA LAW OFFICE
Capital Center South Tower Office 401
239 Arterial Hostos
San Juan, PR 00918
Telephone No.: [phone]
Fax No.: [phone]

David L Ayers
[e-mail]
WATKINS AND EAGER PLLC
P O Box 650
Jackson, MS 39205
Telephone No.: [phone]
Fax No.: [phone]

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Marisol Rodriguez-Marrero, Brenda
Rodriguez-Marrero and David RodriguezMarrero

Antonio Gnocchi-Franco
[e-mail]
GNOCCHI-FRANCO LAW OFFICE
PO Box 193408
San Juan, PR 00919-3408
Telephone No.: [phone]
Fax No.: [phone]

JS-6

Attorneys for Defendant
Toyota Motor Corporation

18

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

19

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
20
21
22
23

IN RE: TOYOTA MOTOR CORP.
UNINTENDED ACCELERATION
MARKETING SALES PRACTICES
AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY
LITIGATION

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

24
25
26
27

This document relates to:
Marisol Rodriguez-Marrero, et al. v.
Toyota Motor North America, Inc., et
al.; Case No.: 8:16-cv01377JVS(FMOx)

Case No. 8:10ML02151 JVS (FMOx)
Case No.: 8:16-cv-01377JVS(FMOx)

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF
DISMISSAL
(FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))

28
23526966

1

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))

1
2

The Court, having read the Stipulation of Dismissal filed by all parties to have
appeared in this action, and finding good cause,

3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed in its entirety with

4
5

prejudice as to all plaintiffs' claims, actions and causes of action asserted against

6

defendants. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees, including, but not limited to,

7

attorney's fees and expert fees. The Court shall retain jurisdiction over the action for 90

8
9
10

days following the entry of this Order (unless extended) for the purposes of enforcing the
terms of the parties’ settlement agreement.

11

IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

DATED: December 30, 2020
13
14

Honorable James V. Selna

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
23526966

2

ORDER ON STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL (FRCP Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii))