James Michael Crawford v. County of Orange et al
Filing
132
JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: 1. Plaintiff James Michael Crawford will have Judgment entered in his favor and against Defendant County of Orange and Defendant/Counterclaimant Dillon P. Alley in th e amount of $15,215.88; 2. Defendant/Counterclaimant Dillon P. Alley will have Judgment entered in his favor and against Plaintiff James Michael Crawford in the amount of $261,400.00; 3. The prevailing party(ies) may recover their costs of suit in accordance with applicable law; and 4. That this matter be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mt)
1
2
JS-6
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 JAMES MICHAEL CRAWFORD,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
CASE NO. 8:16-cv-01503-DOC (DFM)
Assigned for All Purposes to:
Hon. David O. Carter – Crtrm. 9D
vs.
JUDGMENT
14
COUNTY OF ORANGE, DILLON P.
15 ALLEY and DOES 1 through 10,
inclusive,
16
Defendant.
17
18 DILLON P. ALLEY,
19
Counterclaimant,
20
21
22
23
vs.
JAMES MICHAEL CRAWFORD,
Counterdefendant.
24
25
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
JUDGMENT
1
This action came on regularly for trial on April 10, 2018, in Courtroom 9D of
2 the United States District Court, Central District of California located at 411 Fourth
3 Street, Santa Ana, California, the Honorable David O. Carter, presiding.
4
Plaintiff/Counterdefendant James Michael Crawford appeared by attorney
5 Jerry L. Steering. Defendant County of Orange and Defendant/Counterclaimant
6 Dillon P. Alley appeared by attorneys Norman J. Watkins, Pancy Lin, and Rosemary
7 Do. A jury of seven persons was regularly impaneled and sworn.
8
After hearing all of the evidence, the Court duly instructed the jury, and the
9 cause was submitted to the jury. On April 17, 2017, the jury returned to the Court a
10 unanimous Special Verdict as follows:
11 QUESTION NUMBER 1:
12
Did Dillon Alley commit a battery against James Crawford?
13
Yes
14
15
X
No ________
Please answer the next question.
16 QUESTION NUMBER 2:
17
Did James Crawford commit a battery against Dillon Alley?
18
Yes
19
X
No ________
20
21
Please answer the next question.
22 QUESTION NUMBER 3:
23
Did Dillon Alley use excessive force on James Crawford?
24
Yes ________ No
25
26
Please answer the next question.
27
///
28
///
2
JUDGMENT
X
1 QUESTION NUMBER 4:
2
Did Dillon Alley violate James Crawford’s right to free speech?
3
Yes ________ No
4
X
5
6
Please answer the next question.
7 QUESTION NUMBER 5:
8
If you answered yes to Question Number 1, 3, or 4, state the amount of
9 damages suffered by James Crawford.
$
10
15,215.88
11
12
Please answer the next question.
13 QUESTION NUMBER 6:
14
If you answered yes to Question Number 2, state the amount of damages
15 suffered by Dillon Alley?
$
16
11,400.00
17
18
Please answer the next question.
19 QUESTION NUMBER 7
20
If you answered yes to Question Number 1, 3, or 4, do you find that Dillon
21 Alley acted with malice, oppression, or in reckless disregard of James Crawford’s
22 constitutional rights?
Yes ________ No
23
24
X
Please answer the next question.
25 QUESTION NUMBER 8
26
If you answered yes, state the amount of punitive damages for James
27 Crawford against Dillon Alley.
$
28
3
JUDGMENT
0 N/A
1
Please answer the next question.
2 QUESTION NUMBER 9
3
If you answered yes to Question Number 2, do you find that James Crawford
4 acted with malice, oppression, or fraud against Dillon Alley?
5
Yes
6
7
X
No ________
Please answer the next question.
8 QUESTION NUMBER 10
9
If you answered yes, state the amount of punitive damages for Dillon Alley
10 against James Crawford.
$
11
12
250,000.00
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED
13 as follows:
14
1.
Plaintiff James Michael Crawford will have Judgment entered in his
15 favor and against Defendant County of Orange and Defendant/Counterclaimant
16 Dillon P. Alley in the amount of $15,215.88;
17
2.
Defendant/Counterclaimant Dillon P. Alley will have Judgment entered
18 in his favor and against Plaintiff James Michael Crawford in the amount of
19 $261,400.00;
20
3.
The prevailing party(ies) may recover their costs of suit in accordance
21 with applicable law; and
22
4.
That this matter be, and hereby is, dismissed with prejudice.
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24 DATED: April 25, 2018
25
26
27
28
By:
HON. DAVID O. CARTER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
4
JUDGMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?