James Michael Crawford v. County of Orange et al

Filing 46

ORDER RE: PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Douglas F. McCormick. In light of the Non-Opposition filed by Plaintiff's counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, the Court now adopts Defendants' Proposed Order for Protective Order 44 and enters the same as an ORDER of the Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. (dro)

1 NORMAN J. WATKINS – SBN 87327

[e-mail]

2 PANCY LIN – SBN 239684

[e-mail]

3 LYNBERG & WATKINS

A Professional Corporation

4 1100 Town & Country Road, Suite 1450

Orange, California 92868

5 [phone] Telephone

[phone] Facsimile

6
7 Attorneys for Defendant, COUNTY OF ORANGE and Defendant/Counterclaimant

DILLON P. ALLEY

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 JAMES MICHAEL CRAWFORD,

CASE NO. 8:16-cv-01503-DOC (DFM)

12

Assigned for All Purposes to:
Hon. David O. Carter – Crtrm. 9C

Plaintiff,
13
14

ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER

vs.

15

[Discovery Document: Referred to
Magistrate Judge Douglas F.
McCormick]

COUNTY OF ORANGE, DILLON P.

16 ALLEY and DOES 1 through 10,

inclusive,

17

Trial Date:

Defendant.

18

Complaint filed: August 15, 2016

19
20

December 19, 2017

DILLON P. ALLEY,
Counterclaimant,

21
22
23

vs.

24 JAMES MICHAEL CRAWFORD,
25

Counterdefendant.

26
27

///

28

///
1

ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER

1
2

ORDER
In light of the Non-Opposition filed by Plaintiff’s counsel, and good cause

3 appearing therefor, the Court now adopts Defendants’ Proposed Order for Protective
4 Order and enters the same as an ORDER of the Court.
5 IT IS SO ORDERED.
6 Dated: October 17, 2017

__________________________
Hon. Douglas F. McCormick
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

ORDER RE PROTECTIVE ORDER