Bert-Co Industries, Inc. et al v. Instant Web, Inc. et al

Filing 145

JUDGMENT on Attorneys' Fees Owed by Attorney Victor Luke to Counsel for Plaintiffs by Judge James V. Selna. As of September 28, 2017, Mr. Luke has failed to contact Plaintiffs' counsel or submit a stipulation and proposed order of the agre ed-upon payment terms for the ordered fees by the close of business on September 26, 2017. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1. Judgment is entered in favor of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, LLP and against Victor Luke in the amount of $1,522.50. (dro)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

MUSICK, PEELER & GARRETT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
ONE WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE 2000
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017-3383
TELEPHONE [phone]
FACSIMILE [phone]

Kenneth L. Perkins, Jr. (State Bar No. 113531)
[e-mail]
Geoffrey C. Brethen (State Bar No. 259873)
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs BERT-CO INDUSTRIES, INC. and PENN INDUSTRIES,
INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12 BERT-CO INDUSTRIES, INC., et al.,
Plaintiffs,

13

16

Hon. James V. Selna

vs.

14
15

CASE No. 8:16-cv-01518-JVS-DFMx

INSTANT WEB, INC., et al.,
Defendants.

17

JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’
FEES OWED BY ATTORNEY
VICTOR LUKE TO COUNSEL FOR
PLAINTIFFS

18
As of September 28, 2017, Mr. Luke has failed to contact Plaintiffs’ counsel

19

20 or submit a stipulation and proposed order of the agreed-upon payment terms for the
21 ordered fees by the close of business on September 26, 2017.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1071459.1

Case No. 8:16-cv-01518-JVS-DFMx
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES OWED BY ATTORNEY VICTOR LUKE TO COUNSEL
FOR PLAINTIFFS

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED

2 that:
3

1.

Judgment is entered in favor of Musick, Peeler & Garrett, LLP and

4 against Victor Luke in the amount of $1,522.50.
5
6
7
8 Dated: October 04, 2017
9

____________________________
Hon. James V. Selna
United States District Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MUSICK, PEELER
& GARRETT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1071459.1

Case No. 8:16-cv-01518-JVS-DFMx
2
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES OWED BY ATTORNEY VICTOR LUKE TO COUNSEL
FOR PLAINTIFFS

PROOF OF SERVICE

1

2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE
3
At the time of service, I was over 18 years of age and not a party to this
4 action. I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. My business
address is 650 Town Center Drive, Suite 1200, Costa Mesa, CA 92626-1925.
5
On September 28, 2017, I served true copies of the following document(s)
6
described as: [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES OWED BY
7 ATTORNEY VICTOR LUKE TO COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS on the
8 interested parties in this action as follows:
9
10



BY CM/ECF NOTICE OF ELECTRONIC FILING: I electronically filed
the document(s) with the Clerk of the Court by using the CM/ECF system.
Participants in the case who are registered CM/ECF users will be served by
the CM/ECF system. Participants in the case who are not registered CM/ECF
users will be served by mail or by other means permitted by the court rules.

11
12
13

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California
14 that the foregoing is true and correct.
15
Executed on September 28, 2017, at Costa Mesa, California.
16
17
/s/ Holli Kiyomi
Holli Kiyomi

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MUSICK, PEELER
& GARRETT LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1071459.1

Case No. 8:16-cv-01518-JVS-DFMx
3
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT ON ATTORNEYS’ FEES OWED BY ATTORNEY VICTOR LUKE TO COUNSEL
FOR PLAINTIFFS