Vick Saini v. Motion Recruitment Partners, LLC et al

Filing 19

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott: See document for further information. (lwag)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 BRIAN L. JOHNSRUD, State Bar No. 184474 JENNIFER LOTZ, State Bar No. 196925 CURLEY, HURTGEN & JOHNSRUD LLP 4400 Bohannon Drive, Suite 230 Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650.600.5300 Facsimile: 650.323.1002 Email: bjohnsrud@chjllp.com jlotz@chjllp.com Attorneys for Defendant MOTION RECRUITMENT PARTNERS, LLC 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 SCOTT B. COOPER, State Bar No. 174520 SAMANTHA A. SMITH, State Bar No. 233331 THE COOPER LAW FIRM, P.C. 4000 Barranca Parkway, Suite 250 Irvine, California 92604 Telephone: 949.724.9200 Facsimile: 949.724.9255 Attorneys for Plaintiff VICK SAINI 15 16 [Additional Counsel Listed on Next Page] 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 20 21 VICK SAINI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the general public, 22 Plaintiffs, Case No. SACV16-01534 JVS(KES) [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 23 v. 24 25 26 27 MOTION RECRUITMENT PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. 28 C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 2 3 4 MARC PHELPS, State Bar No. 237036 THE PHELPS LAW GROUP 23 Corporate Plaza Drive, Suite 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: 949.629.2533 Facsimile: 949.629.2501 5 6 7 8 9 10 ROGER CARTER, State Bar No. 140196 THE CARTER LAW FIRM 23 Corporate Plaza Drive, Suite 150 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Telephone: 949.629.2565 Facsimile: 949.629.2501 Attorneys for Plaintiff VICK SAINI 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 1 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 1. A. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary or private information for which special protection from public 4 disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may 5 be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to 6 enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this 7 Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to 8 discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 9 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment 10 under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth 11 in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to 12 file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the 13 procedure that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 14 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 15 16 B. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing 17 information, information protected by third party privacy rights, information 18 subject to non-disclosure agreements with third parties, and other valuable research, 19 development, commercial, financial, technical and/or proprietary information for 20 which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other 21 than prosecution of this action is warranted. Such confidential and proprietary 22 materials and information consist of, among other things, confidential business or 23 financial information, information regarding confidential business practices, or 24 other confidential research, development, or commercial information (including 25 information implicating privacy rights of third parties and information subject to 26 non-disclosure agreements with third parties), information otherwise generally 27 unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from 28 disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 2 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 2 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 3 protect information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the 4 parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for 5 and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and 6 serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this 7 matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as 8 confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good 9 faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and 10 there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 11 2. DEFINITIONS 12 2.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit. 13 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 14 15 designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 16 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 17 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 18 the Good Cause Statement. 19 20 21 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or 22 items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 23 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless 25 of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, 26 among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced 27 or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 28 C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 3 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 2 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as 3 an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 4 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 5 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside 6 counsel. 7 8 9 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 10 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and 11 have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm 12 that has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 13 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 14 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their 15 support staffs). 16 17 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 18 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 19 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 20 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) 21 and their employees and subcontractors. 22 23 24 25 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing Party. 26 3. 27 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 28 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK SCOPE 4 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 2 compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 3 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 4 5 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 6 4. DURATION 7 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations 8 imposed by this Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees 9 otherwise in writing or a court order otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be 10 deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and defenses in this Action, 11 with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion and 12 exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this Action, 13 including the time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time 14 pursuant to applicable law. 15 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 16 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. 17 Each Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under 18 this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that 19 qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for 20 protection only those parts of material, documents, items or oral or written 21 communications that qualify so that other portions of the material, documents, 22 items or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept 23 unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. 24 Mass, indiscriminate or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations 25 that are shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper 26 purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily encumber the case development process or to 27 impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the 28 Designating Party to sanctions. C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 5 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it 2 designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must 3 promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation. 4 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in 5 this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise 6 stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection 7 under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or 8 produced. 9 10 Designation in conformity with this Order requires: (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic 11 documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial 12 proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend 13 “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that 14 contains protected material. If only a portion of the material on a page qualifies for 15 protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) 16 (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). 17 A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection 18 need not designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated 19 which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and 20 before the designation, all of the material made available for inspection shall be 21 deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the 22 documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine 23 which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. 24 Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the 25 “CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page that contains Protected Material. If only a 26 portion of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also 27 must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings 28 in the margins). C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 6 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 (b) for testimony given in depositions, the entire transcript will be 2 conditionally designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” on the record and any Party will 3 then have thirty (30) days following receipt of the certified transcript to designate 4 any portion of the transcript as “CONFIDENTIAL” by sending written notice of 5 such designation to all other Parties and the court reporter. 6 (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and 7 for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on 8 the exterior of the container or containers in which the information is stored the 9 legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information 10 warrants protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, shall identify the 11 protected portion(s). 12 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent 13 failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive 14 the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such 15 material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make 16 reasonable efforts to assure that the material is treated in accordance with the 17 provisions of this Order. 18 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 19 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a 20 designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s 21 Scheduling Order. 22 23 24 6.2 Meet and Confer. The Challenging Party shall initiate the dispute resolution process under Local Rule 37.1 et seq. 6.3 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding shall be on 25 the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper 26 purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other 27 parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating 28 Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties shall C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 7 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is 2 entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the 3 challenge. 4 7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 5 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is 6 disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this 7 Action only for prosecuting, defending or attempting to settle this Action. Such 8 Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the 9 conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a 10 Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL 11 DISPOSITION). 12 Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a 13 location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons 14 authorized under this Order. 15 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless 16 otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a 17 Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated 18 “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: 19 (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as well 20 as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary 21 to disclose the information for this Action; 22 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the 23 Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and 24 who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 25 (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom 26 disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the 27 “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 28 C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK (d) the court and its personnel; 8 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 (e) court reporters and their staff; 2 (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional 3 Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have 4 signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 5 6 7 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information; (h) during their depositions, witnesses in the Action to whom disclosure is 8 reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement 9 to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or 10 ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to 11 depositions that reveal Protected Material may be separately bound by the court 12 reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this 13 Stipulated Protective Order; and 14 (i) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, 15 mutually agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions, and 16 who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A). 17 18 19 8. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED IN OTHER LITIGATION If a Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation 20 that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as 21 “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must: 22 23 (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification shall include a copy of the subpoena or court order; 24 (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to 25 issue in the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena 26 or order is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification shall include a copy 27 of this Stipulated Protective Order; and 28 C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 9 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 2 3 (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with 4 the subpoena or court order shall not produce any information designated in this 5 action as “CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the 6 subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s 7 permission. The Designating Party shall bear the burden and expense of seeking 8 protection in that court of its confidential material and nothing in these provisions 9 should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action 10 11 12 13 to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 9. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO BE PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non- 14 Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information 15 produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the 16 remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be 17 construed as prohibiting a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. 18 (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to 19 produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is 20 subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s 21 confidential information, then the Party shall: 22 (1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that 23 some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement 24 with a Non-Party; 25 (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective 26 Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific 27 description of the information requested; and 28 C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 10 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 2 3 (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the NonParty, if requested. (c) If the Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court within 14 4 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party 5 may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery 6 request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party shall 7 not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the 8 confidentiality agreement with the Non-Party before a determination by the court. 9 Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party shall bear the burden and 10 expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material. 11 10. UNAUTHORIZED DISCLOSURE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 12 If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed 13 Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this 14 Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in 15 writing the Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best 16 efforts to retrieve all unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the 17 person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of 18 this Order, and (d) request such person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment 19 and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. 20 21 22 11. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain 23 inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other 24 protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal 25 Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify 26 whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for 27 production without prior privilege review. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 28 502(d) and (e), insofar as the parties reach an agreement on the effect of disclosure C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 11 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 of a communication or information covered by the attorney-client privilege or work 2 product protection, the parties may incorporate their agreement in the stipulated 3 protective order submitted to the court. 4 12. 5 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the right of any 6 7 MISCELLANEOUS person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this 8 Protective Order, no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to 9 disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in 10 this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on 11 any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective 12 Order. 13 12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any 14 Protected Material must comply with Local Civil Rule 79-5. Protected Material 15 may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the 16 specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party’s request to file Protected Material 17 under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information 18 in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court. 19 13. FINAL DISPOSITION 20 After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60 21 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must 22 return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As 23 used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, 24 compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the 25 Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the 26 Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if 27 not the same person or entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that 28 (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 12 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any 2 copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries or any other format reproducing or 3 capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel 4 are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, 5 deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition 6 and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert 7 work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival 8 copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective 9 Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). 10 // 11 // 12 // 13 // 14 // 15 // 16 // 17 // 18 // 19 // 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 13 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 14. 2 Any violation of this Order may be punished by appropriate measures 3 VIOLATION including, without limitation, contempt proceedings and/or monetary sanctions. 4 5 IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD. 6 7 Dated: December ___, 2016 THE PHELPS LAW GROUP 8 9 By:__________________________________ MARC H. PHELPS Co-Counsel for Plaintiff VICK SAINI 10 11 12 13 Dated: December ___, 2016 CURLEY, HURTGEN & JOHNSRUD LLP 14 15 16 By:__________________________________ BRIAN L. JOHNSRUD Attorneys for Defendant MOTION RECRUITMENT PARTNERS, LLC 17 18 19 20 FOR GOOD CAUSE SHOWN, IT IS SO ORDERED. 21 22 23 DATED: December 21, 2016 _________________________________ Karen E. Scott United States Magistrate Judge 24 25 26 27 28 C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 14 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES) 1 EXHIBIT A 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND AGREEMENT TO BE BOUND 3 I, _____________________________ [print or type full name], of 4 _________________________________________ [print or type full address], 5 declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the 6 Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for 7 the Central District of California on ______________, 2016 in the case of Vick 8 Saini, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and on behalf of the 9 general public, v. Motion Recruitment Partners, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability 10 Corporation, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Case No. 8:16-cv-01534-JVS- 11 KES. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated 12 Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could 13 expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly 14 promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is 15 subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict 16 compliance with the provisions of this Order. 17 I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court 18 for the Central District of California for enforcing the terms of this Stipulated 19 Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of 20 this action. I hereby appoint __________________________ [print or type full 21 name] of ____________________________________________________ [print 22 or type full address and telephone number] as my California agent for service of 23 process in connection with this action or any proceedings related to enforcement of 24 this Stipulated Protective Order. 25 Date: ______________________________________ 26 City and State where sworn and signed: _________________________________ 27 Printed name: _______________________________ 28 Signature: __________________________________ C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N & J O H NS RU D L L P COUNSELORS AT LAW MENLO PARK 15 [PROPOSED] STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER (CASE NO. 16-CV-01534-JVS(KES)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?