Vick Saini v. Motion Recruitment Partners, LLC et al

Filing 28

JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna Granting Defendant Motion Recruitment Partnes, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment 20 . Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Defendant Motion Recruitment Partners, LLC's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRAN TED, and Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant Motion Recruitment Partners, LLC and against Plaintiff Vick Saini as to each and every claim for relief alleged in Plaintiff's Class and Collective Action Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

BRIAN L. JOHNSRUD, State Bar No. 184474
JENNIFER LOTZ, State Bar No. 196925
CURLEY, HURTGEN & JOHNSRUD LLP
4400 Bohannon Drive, Suite 230
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:[phone]
Facsimile: 650.323.1002
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

JS-6

Attorneys for Defendant
MOTION RECRUITMENT PARTNERS, LLC

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12
13

VICK SAINI, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated
and on behalf of the general public,

14
15
16
17
18
19

Plaintiffs,
v.
MOTION RECRUITMENT
PARTNERS, LLC, a Delaware
Limited Liability Corporation, and
DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
Defendants.

Case No. 16-CV-01534 JVS(KES)
JUDGMENT GRANTING
DEFENDANT MOTION
RECRUITMENT PARTNERS,
LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMEMT OF PLAINTIFF VICK
SAINI’S CLASS AND COLLECTIVE
ACTION COMPLAINT
DATE:
TIME:
DEPT:
JUDGE:

March 6, 2017
1:30 P.M.
Courtroom 10C
Hon. James V. Selna

20
21
22

Complaint Filed:
July 19, 2016
(Removed August 19, 2016)
Discovery Cut-Off: December 12, 2017
Trial Date:
March 27, 2018

23
24
25
26
27
28
C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N &
J O HN S RU D L L P
COUNSELORS AT LAW
MENLO PARK

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(CASE NO. 16-CV-01534 (KES))

1

Defendant Motion Recruitment Partners, LLC’s (“Defendant”) Motion for

2

Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, for Partial Summary Judgment on the

3

claims in Plaintiff Vick Saini’s Class and Collective Action Complaint, or for an

4

Order Treating Certain Facts As Established, brought pursuant to Federal Rule of

5

Civil Procedure 56, was scheduled for hearing on March 6, 2017.

6

After considering the moving, opposition, and reply briefs, the evidence

7

submitted by the parties, and the arguments presented by the parties’ respective

8

counsel, this Court finds that:

9

There is no genuine dispute as to any material fact as to any of the claims for

10

relief set forth in Plaintiff Vick Saini’s Class and Collective Action Complaint, and,

11

therefore, Defendant is entitled to summary judgment as to each and every claim

12

alleged in Plaintiff’s Class and Collective Action Complaint as a matter of law.

13

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

14

Defendant Motion Recruitment Partners, LLC’s Motion for Summary

15

Judgment is GRANTED, and

16

Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Defendant Motion Recruitment

17

Partners, LLC and against Plaintiff Vick Saini as to each and every claim for relief

18

alleged in Plaintiff’s Class and Collective Action Complaint.

19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22
23

Dated: March 6, 2017

__________________________________
Hon. James V. Selna
United States District Court Judge

24
25
26
27
28
C U R L E Y , H U RT GE N &
J O HN S RU D L L P
COUNSELORS AT LAW
MENLO PARK

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(CASE NO. 16-CV-01534 (KES))