Robert J Neely v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing 127

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION PURSUANT TO FED. R. Civ. P §41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 126 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (es)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

David J. Vendler
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID J. VENDLER
2700 South Oak Knoll Ave.
San Marino, CA 91108
Tel: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Michael R. Brown
MICHAEL R. BROWN APC
2030 Main Street Suite 550
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

ROBERT J. NEELY, individually, and on )
behalf of the class of all others similarly )
)
situated,
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 8:16-cv-01924-AG (KESx)
[Assigned to Hon. Andrew J. Guilford]

ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR
DISMISSAL OF ACTION
PURSUANT TO
FED. R. Civ. P §41(a)(1)(A)(ii)

Action Filed:
Trial Date:

Oct. 21, 2016
April 2, 2018

24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Case No. 8:16-cv-01924-AG (KESx)

1
2
3
4
5

WHEREAS, Plaintiff Robert J. Neely (“Plaintiff”) filed with the Court a
Notice of Settlement on August 24, 2018, (ECF No.124);
WHEREAS, the Court stayed the action pending final settlement, and

6

required Plaintiff and Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMC”; with

7

Plaintiff, collectively, the “Parties”) to file settlement documents and/or a dismissal

8

by September 28, 2018, (ECF No. 125);

9

WHEREAS the Parties have finalized the settlement;

10
11

WHEREAS, prior to reaching the settlement, no class was certified, no

12

motion for class certification was filed, and no notice of pendency of this action

13

was communicated to any alleged class members.

14
15
16
17
18
19

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and
between the Parties through their respective counsel:
1.

That the action be dismissed with prejudice as to Plaintiff and

dismissed without prejudice as to all other alleged class members; and
2.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Court reserves jurisdiction over

20

the Parties pursuant to Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co., 511 U.S. 375

21

(1994), to enforce the terms of their settlement.

22
23

//

24

//

25

//

26
27
28
2
ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Case No. 8:16-cv-01924-AG (KESx)

1

D

2

PURSUANT TO THIS STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4
5
6
7

Dated: September 28, 2018

______________________________
Hon. Andrew J. Guilford
United States District Judge

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION
Case No. 8:16-cv-01924-AG (KESx)