Stephan Wurth Photography Inc v. Wetpaint.com Inc et al

Filing 86

JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Stephan Wurth Photography Inc against Wetpaint.com Inc. $50,000 statutory damages; $3,600 attorney's fees; and $1,335.04 for its costs of suit. Related to: Order on Motion for Default Judgment, 84 . A true and correct copy of the Order Granting in Part Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment (Docket No. 84 ) is attached hereto as Exhibit A and is fully incorporated herein. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

Peter R. Afrasiabi (Bar No. 193336)
Email: [e-mail]
John Tehranian (Bar. No. 211616)
Email: [e-mail]
ONE LLP
4000 MacArthur Blvd.
East Tower, Suite 500
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

JS-6

Joanna Ardalan, Esq. (Bar No. 285384)
Email: [e-mail]
ONE LLP
9301 Wilshire Blvd.
Penthouse Suite
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Stephan Wurth Photography, Inc.

13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SOUTHERN DIVISION

16
17
18

STEPHAN WURTH PHOTOGRAPHY,
INC., a Florida corporation,

20
21
22
23
24
25

Hon. David O. Carter
JUDGMENT

Plaintiff,

19

Case No. 8:16-cv-02101-DOC-JCG

v.
WETPAINT.COM, INC., a Delaware
corporation; BRETT ROSIN, an individual;
GRANT BROWN, an individual, and
DOES 1-10 INCLUSIVE,
Defendants.

26
27
28
JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment be

1
2

entered against Wetpaint and in favor of Plaintiff as follows:
1.

3
4

Inc. the sum of $50,000 in statutory damages;
2.

5
6

Defendant Wetpaint.com, Inc. shall pay Plaintiff Stephen Wurth Photography,

Inc. for attorneys’ fees the sum of $3,600; and
3.

7
8

Defendant Wetpaint.com, Inc. shall pay Plaintiff Stephen Wurth Photography,

Defendant Wetpaint.com, Inc. shall pay Plaintiff Stephen Wurth Photography,

Inc. for its costs of suit the sum of $1,335.04.

9

A true and correct copy of the Order Granting in Part Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default

10

Judgment (Docket No. 84) is attached hereto as Exhibit A and is fully incorporated herein.

11
12
13

Date:

October 15, 2018
Hon. David O. Carter
United States District Judge

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1
JUDGMENT

PROOF OF SERVICE

1
2

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE

3

I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of 18
and not a party to the within action; my business address is 4000 MacArthur Boulevard,
East Tower, Suite 500, Newport Beach, California 92660.

4
5
6
7

On October 12, 2018, I caused the document(s) listed below to be served to the
address(es) and by the method of service described as follows:
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

10

Wetpaint.com Inc.
c/o Function X Inc.
WETPAINT.COM INC.
902 Broadway 11th Floor
New York, NY 10010
212-231-0092

11

PRO SE

8
9

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

[X]

(BY MAIL) I am “readily familiar” with the firm’s practice for collection and
processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be
deposited with the U.S. Postal Service on that same day with postage thereon
fully prepaid at Newport Beach, California in the ordinary course of business.
I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if
postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date
of deposit for mailing in affidavit.

I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at
whose direction the service was made.
Executed on October 12, 2018 at Newport Beach, California.

20
21
22

Robin Golder

23
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE