Krysten Griffith v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc et al

Filing 24

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Karen E. Scott re Stipulation for Protective Order 23 . NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. (see document for details). (dro)

Download PDF
1 NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KRYSTEN GRIFFITH, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 vs. HAWAIIAN AIRLINES, INC., a corporation, and DOES 1 to 20, 15 Defendants. 16 17 ) Case No. 8:16-CV-02109-JLS-KES ) ) [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 18 19 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and the parties’ 20 Stipulation for Protective Order (“Order”) governing the disclosure during pretrial 21 discovery and the subsequent handling of sensitive and confidential information, it 22 is hereby ordered that: 23 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 24 1.1 Scope. This Protective Order shall apply to proceedings and 25 discovery in the above-captioned cases known as Griffith v. Hawaiian Airlines, 26 Inc., et al., Case No. 16-cv-02109-JLS-(KES). 27 28 1.2 Need. This case arises from a July 4, 2016, incident in which hot tea allegedly spilled on Krysten Griffith while she was a passenger on Hawaiian [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 Airlines flight 002, from Honolulu, Hawaii to Los Angeles, California. The parties 2 anticipate that discovery in this matter may involve: (1) Hawaiian’s non-public 3 policies and procedures for providing various services to passengers, (2) 4 Hawaiian’s non-public policies and procedures related to passenger injuries, (3) 5 Hawaiian’s non-public policies and procedures related to equipment maintenance 6 and servicing, (4) Hawaiian’s non-public public policies and procedures, 7 disclosures of which are, or may be governed by 49 C.F.R. Part 1520, (5) 8 confidential information regarding other passengers on the subject flight, 9 disclosure of which is or may be governed by the California Constitution, as well 10 as federal regulations, including 14 C.F.R. Part 243.9, (6) Krysten Griffith’s health 11 status and history, and (7) Plaintiff’s damages, as reflected in, inter alia, 12 employment, financial and medical records, and other private documents. 13 Discovery concerning these and other topics may necessitate the disclosure 14 of what a party may contend is confidential and sensitive information, such as, 15 personal information for individuals who are not parties to this lawsuit, financial 16 information, Richard Rosen’s medical, employment and financial information, and 17 plaintiffs’ medical, employment and financial information, and non-public 18 business practices. Prior to production, no party can effectively evaluate the 19 claims of the other as to the need for protection. Thus, a means that enables the 20 production of documents at least to the point of evaluating the asserted need for 21 protection, as well as an order specifying how such documents need to be treated, 22 is required in this case. Moreover, pursuant to the terms of this Order, any 23 document designated as confidential where that designation is disputed can be 24 identified as such and the matter submitted to the Court for resolution. 25 In essence, in the absence of this Order, the Court would have to evaluate 26 innumerable documents individually, and this task would likely severely burden 27 the Court’s processes and slow discovery. As to those documents that are entitled 28 to protection, disclosure of such confidential information is likely to prejudice the [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES -2- LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 legitimate business, competitive, and/or privacy interests of parties or of third 2 parties. 3 A protective order is thus needed in this action to enable the documents to be 4 evaluated and to protect against unauthorized disclosure of confidential 5 information and to ensure that such information will be used only for purposes of 6 this action. A protective order will also expedite the flow of discovery materials, 7 protect the integrity of truly confidential information, promote the prompt 8 resolution of disputes over confidentiality, and facilitate the preservation of 9 material worthy of protection. 10 1.3 Application. This Order shall govern any information produced in 11 this litigation by any party or third party, in any form (including, but not limited to, 12 documents, magnetic media, answers to interrogatories, responses to document 13 demands, responses to requests for admissions, and deposition testimony and 14 transcripts), when there is an objectively reasonable basis for the party producing 15 the information to believe in good faith that the information to be produced 16 contains private, proprietary, sensitive, trade secret, non-public financial or 17 medical information. Documents, or portions thereof, that are considered 18 confidential may be so designated by marking them, in their entirety, as 19 “CONFIDENTIAL”, as hereinafter provided for in this Order. 20 1.4 Limitations. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer 21 blanket protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the 22 protection it affords extends only to the information or items that are entitled under 23 the applicable legal principles to treatment as confidential. 24 2. 25 DEFINITIONS 2.1 Confidential Information. “Confidential Information” shall mean 26 and include, without limitation, any information that concerns or relates to 27 proprietary information, trade secrets, non-public commercial, financial, pricing, 28 budgeting and/or accounting information, non-public information about existing [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES -3- LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 and potential customers, marketing studies, performance and projections, non- 2 public business strategies, decisions and/or negotiations, personnel compensation, 3 evaluations and other employment information, non-public risk management 4 practices and strategies, non-public agreements with third parties, and confidential 5 proprietary information about affiliates, parents, subsidiaries and third parties with 6 whom the parties to this action have or have had business relationships, personal 7 identifying information for individuals who are not parties to this lawsuit, health 8 and medical information, and financial and employment records. 9 For purposes of this section, “trade secrets” means information, including a 10 formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or process, 11 that: (1) derives independent economic value, actual or potential, from not being 12 generally known to the public or to other persons who can obtain economic value 13 from its disclosure or use; and (2) is the subject of efforts that are reasonable under 14 the circumstances to maintain its secrecy. 15 2.2 Documents. As used herein, the term “documents” includes all 16 writings, records, files, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, emails, videotapes, 17 audio tapes, compact discs, electronic messages, other data compilations from 18 which information can be obtained, and other tangible things subject to production 19 under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 20 2.3 Designating Party. The “Designating Party” is the party or non-party 21 that designates information or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses 22 to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 24 2.4 Producing Party. The “Producing Party” is the party or non-party that produces documents in this action. 25 2.5 Receiving Party. The “Receiving Party” is the party that receives 26 documents from a Producing Party. 27 3. 28 INITIAL DESIGNATION 3.1 Produced Documents. A Producing Party that has an objectively [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES -4- LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 reasonable basis for believing in good faith that the documents to be produced 2 constitute or contain Confidential Information shall produce copies bearing a label 3 that contains (or includes) language substantially identical to the following: 4 “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” or 5 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 6 These labels shall be affixed in a manner that does not obliterate or obscure 7 the contents of the copies. Claims of confidentiality will be made only with 8 respect to documents to which the Designating Party has an objectively reasonable 9 basis for believing in good faith that the documents contain Confidential 10 Information and are legally entitled to protection from discovery and disclosure 11 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) and applicable case law. 12 If it comes to the Designating Party’s attention that information or items that 13 it designated for protection do not qualify for the asserted protection, the 14 Designating Party must promptly notify all other parties that it is withdrawing the 15 mistaken designation. If the Designating Party is also the Producing Party, then 16 that party must also produce substitute copies of the documents with the 17 “Confidential” label removed. 18 3.2 Interrogatory Answers. If a party answering an interrogatory has an 19 objectively reasonable basis for believing in good faith that its answer contains 20 Confidential Information, it shall set forth its answer in a separate document that is 21 produced and designated in the same manner as a produced document under 22 subparagraph 3.1. The answers to interrogatories should make reference to the 23 separately produced document containing the answer, but such document should 24 not be attached to the interrogatories. 25 3.3 Inspections of Documents. In the event a party elects to produce 26 files and records for inspection and the requesting party elects to inspect them, no 27 designation of Confidential Information need be made in advance of the 28 inspection. For the purposes of such inspection, all material inspected shall be [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES -5- LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 considered as Confidential Information. If the inspecting party selects specified 2 documents to be copied, the Producing Party shall designate Confidential 3 Information in accordance with subparagraph 3.1 at the time the copies are 4 produced. 5 3.4 Deposition Transcripts. If, during a deposition in this action, a party 6 has an objectively reasonable basis for believing in good faith that counsel’s 7 questions implicate Confidential Information, or if counsel uses an exhibit that has 8 been designated as “Confidential,” a party may designate that portion of the 9 deposition as “Confidential.” Only those pages of the deposition that are 10 designated as “Confidential” and those exhibits that are designated as 11 “Confidential” will be subject to the restrictions set forth in this Protective Order. 12 A party may challenge any designation made in connection with a deposition as set 13 forth in section 5 below. 14 Within 10 days after the receipt of a deposition transcript, a party may 15 inform the other parties to the action of additional portions of the transcript 16 (including exhibits) that it wishes to designate as Confidential Information. That 17 portion of the deposition transcript (including exhibits referred to therein) shall be 18 treated as Confidential Information for ten (10) days after receipt. If no 19 designation is made within ten (10) days of receipt, no additional portions of the 20 deposition transcript, other than those designated as Confidential during the 21 deposition shall be considered as Confidential Information. All parties in 22 possession of a copy of a designated deposition transcript shall mark the front of 23 each copy of the transcript with: “PORTIONS MARKED CONFIDENTIAL”. 24 For videotaped depositions in which a portion has been designated as confidential, 25 the videocassette, DVD, and the containers shall also be marked with: 26 “PORTIONS MARKED CONFIDENTIAL.” 27 28 3.5 Multi-page Documents. A party may designate all pages of an integrated, multi-page document, including a deposition transcript and [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES -6- LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 interrogatory answers, as Confidential Information by placing the label specified in 2 subparagraph 3.1 on the first page of the document. If a party wishes to designate 3 only certain portions of an integrated, multi-page document as Confidential 4 Information, it should designate such portions immediately below the label on the 5 first page of the document and place the label specified in subparagraph 3.1 on 6 each page of the document containing Confidential Information. 7 3.6 Electronic Data. “Electronic data” means information stored or 8 recorded in the form of electronic or magnetic media (including information, files, 9 databases or programs stored on any digital or analog machine-readable device, 10 computers, discs, networks or tapes). Counsel for the Producing Party will 11 designate Electronic Data as “CONFIDENTIAL” in a cover letter identifying the 12 information generally. When feasible, counsel for the Producing Party will also 13 mark the electronic or magnetic media with the appropriate designation. 14 Whenever any party to whom Electronic Data designated as Confidential 15 Information is produced reduces such material to hardcopy form, such party shall 16 mark the hardcopy form with the label specified in subparagraph 3.1. Whenever 17 any Confidential Information Electronic Data is copied into another file, all such 18 copies shall also be marked “CONFIDENTIAL” as appropriate. 19 To the extent that any party or counsel for any party creates, develops or 20 otherwise establishes on any digital or analog machine-readable device, recording 21 media, computers, discs, networks or tapes any information, files, databases or 22 programs that contain information designated “CONFIDENTIAL”, that party and 23 its counsel must take all necessary steps to ensure that access to that electronic or 24 magnetic media is properly restricted to those persons who, by the terms of this 25 Order, may have access to Confidential Information. 26 3.7 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If a Producing Party 27 inadvertently fails to stamp or otherwise appropriately designate certain documents 28 upon their production, it may thereafter designate such document as [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES -7- LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 “CONFIDENTIAL” by promptly giving written notice to all parties that the 2 material is to be so designated. Such written notice shall identify with specificity 3 the information or documents the Producing Party is then designating to be 4 “CONFIDENTIAL” material. If the Producing Party gives such written notice as 5 provided above, their claims of confidentiality shall not be deemed to have been 6 waived by failure to designate properly the information as “CONFIDENTIAL” 7 prior to disclosure. If the Designating Party is also the Producing Party, then that 8 party must also produce substitute copies of the documents with the “Confidential” 9 label added. The Receiving Party shall then return to the Designating Party, or 10 destroy, as the parties may agree, all known copies of the originally-produced, 11 unstamped documents. The Receiving Party shall use its best efforts to ensure that 12 the information that was inadvertently disclosed is thereafter restricted to only 13 those persons entitled to receive “CONFIDENTIAL” information under the terms 14 set forth herein. 15 3.8 Rule 26 Disclosures. If a party making mandatory disclosures 16 required believes that its answer contains Confidential Information, it shall set 17 forth its answer in a separate document that is produced and designated in the same 18 manner as a produced document under subparagraph 3.1. Such disclosure should 19 make reference to the separately produced document containing the information, 20 but such document should not be attached to the disclosure. 21 3.9 22 Any information or document that is determined by the Transportation Sensitive Security Information 23 Safety Administration (“TSA”), or any other governmental entity to constitute 24 Sensitive Security Information (“SSI”) as that term is defined by applicable federal 25 regulations, shall be handled in the manner proscribed by the TSA or other entity 26 that asserts such designation. 27 4. 28 DESIGNATIONS BY ANOTHER PARTY 4.1 Notification of Designation. If a party other than the Producing [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES -8- LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 Party believes that a Producing Party has produced a document that contains or 2 constitutes Confidential Information of the non-Producing Party, the non- 3 Producing Party may designate the document as “CONFIDENTIAL” by so 4 notifying all parties in writing, including by facsimile or email within thirty (30) 5 days of service of the document. 6 4.2 Return of Documents; Non-disclosure. Whenever a party other than 7 the Producing Party designates a document produced by a Producing Party as 8 Confidential Information in accordance with subparagraph 4.1, the Designating 9 Party shall produced substitute copies of the document with the 10 “CONFIDENTIAL” designations added in accordance with subparagraph 3.1. The 11 Receiving Party shall then return to the Designating Party, or destroy, as the parties 12 may agree, all known copies of the originally-produced, unstamped documents. 13 No party shall disclose a produced document to any person, other than the persons 14 authorized to receive Confidential Information under subparagraph 7.1, until after 15 the expiration of the thirty (30) day designation period specified in subparagraph 16 4.1. If during the thirty (30) day designation period, a party discloses a produced 17 document to a person authorized to receive Confidential Information under 18 subparagraph 7.1, and that document is subsequently designated as Confidential 19 Information in accordance with subparagraph 4.1, the disclosing party shall cause 20 all copies of the document to be destroyed or returned to the Producing Party, at 21 the direction of the Producing Party. The party may thereafter disclose a copy of 22 the document that has been marked as Confidential Information by the Designating 23 Party, in accordance with subparagraph 7.1. 24 5. 25 OBJECTIONS TO DESIGNATIONS A party is not obligated to challenge the propriety of a “CONFIDENTIAL” 26 designation at the time made, and failure to do so will not preclude a subsequent 27 challenge thereto. In the event that a party disagrees with a “CONFIDENTIAL” 28 designation, that party shall notify the Designating Party in writing of the [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES -9- LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 disagreement prior to the close of fact discovery. The objecting party and the 2 Designating Party shall promptly confer in an attempt to resolve their differences. 3 Consistent with Local Rule 37-1, as counsel for Plaintiff does not have offices in 4 the same county of the Central District, such conference shall take place 5 telephonically. The parties shall comply with the procedures set forth in Local 6 Rule 37-1, with the party objecting to the confidential designation being the 7 “moving party” referenced in that Local Rule, and the party making the challenged 8 designation being the “opposing party.” If the Designating Party and objecting 9 party are unable to resolve their differences, the Designating Party shall have 10 twenty-one (21) days from the date of receipt of notification from the objecting 11 party to file a motion seeking the Court’s ruling on whether the information should 12 remain designated as “CONFIDENTIAL”. The contested material shall be lodged 13 with the Court under seal. The burden of proving that the information has been 14 properly designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” based on the standards for such 15 designations set forth herein, is on the Designating Party. 16 All documents initially designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall continue to 17 be subject to this Order unless and until the Court rules otherwise. If the 18 Designating Party elects not to make a motion for a clarifying ruling with respect 19 to whether documents should be designated as “CONFIDENTIAL,” the 20 “Confidential” designation shall be deemed to have been withdrawn, and, if the 21 Designating Party is also the Producing Party, then that party must also produce 22 substitute copies of the documents with the “Confidential” label removed. 23 6. 24 CUSTODY During the pendency of this litigation (including any appeals) and for ninety 25 (90) days after the conclusion of this litigation, all Confidential Information and 26 any and all copies, extracts and summaries thereof, including memoranda relating 27 thereto, shall be retained by the Receiving Party in the custody of counsel of 28 record, or by persons to whom disclosure is authorized under subparagraph 7.1 or [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES - 10 - LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 by the Judge. Paragraph 9 addresses in more detail handling of Confidential 2 Information after the conclusion of this litigation. 3 7. 4 5 HANDLING PRIOR TO TRIAL 7.1 Authorized Disclosures 7.1.1 Materials designated “CONFIDENTIAL” shall only be 6 disclosed to the persons listed in the subparagraphs (a) through (h) below. Before 7 disclosing Confidential Information to any of the following persons, counsel shall 8 ensure that the persons receiving Confidential Information are aware of the terms 9 of this Protective Order and agree to comply with those terms: 10 a. Attorneys appearing as counsel of record in these 11 proceedings and personnel who are directly employed by such counsel and who are 12 actively assisting in the preparation of this litigation; 13 b. Counsel’s third-party consultants and independent 14 experts (and their agents and employees) who are employed for the purposes of 15 this litigation; 16 c. Parties to this litigation, limited to the named party and if 17 that party is a corporate entity, those officers, directors, employees, in-house 18 counsel, and insurers whose assistance is required for purposes of the litigation and 19 who must have access to the materials to render such assistance; 20 d. Any deponent, during his or her deposition, who is the 21 Designating Party or a current employee or member of the Designating Party (or 22 any person who prepared or assisted directly in the preparation of the 23 CONFIDENTIAL material); 24 e. Any other deponent as to whom there is a legitimate need 25 to disclose particular materials for purposes of identifying or explaining it or 26 refreshing recollection; 27 28 f. Fact witnesses or potential percipient witnesses at or in preparation for deposition or trial; [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES - 11 - LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 2 g. Outside vendors employed by counsel for copying, scanning and general handling of documents; 3 h. Persons or entities that provide litigation support services 4 in connection with the taking of depositions, including necessary stenographic, 5 videotape, and clerical personnel; and 6 Such disclosures are authorized only to the extent necessary to prosecute or 7 defend this litigation. Information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall not be 8 disclosed to persons described in Paragraphs 7.1.1(b), 7.1.1(e), of 7.1.1(f) unless 9 and until such persons are provided a copy of the Protective Order entered by the 10 Court, represent that they have read and understand the provisions of the Order, are 11 advised by the disclosing counsel that they are bound by the provisions of the 12 Protective Order and execute an Agreement of Confidentiality (“Confidentiality 13 Agreement”) in substantially the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. The originals 14 of such Confidentiality Agreements shall be maintained by the counsel who 15 obtained them until the final resolution of this litigation. Confidentiality 16 Agreements and the names of persons who signed them shall not be subject to 17 discovery except upon agreement of the parties or further order of the Court after 18 application upon notice and good cause shown. 19 7.1.3 Nothing in this Protective Order shall prohibit a party or its 20 counsel from disclosing “CONFIDENTIAL” material to (a) the person(s) who 21 authored the document or material; (b) persons who previously received the 22 document or material or a copy thereof not in violation of this Order; (c) persons 23 employed by the Producing Party; or (d) any other person or entity, provided that, 24 with respect to that person or entity, the Producing Party and Producing Party’s 25 counsel first approve such disclosure in writing. 26 7.2 Additional Protection. If a Designating Party believes that the 27 disclosure and handling procedures provided for in this Order are not sufficient 28 because certain material is extremely sensitive, the Designating Party shall inform [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES - 12 - LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 the other parties to the litigation and attempt to reach an agreement on the handling 2 of the material. If the parties cannot reach an agreement, the Designating Party 3 may file a motion with the court for a more restrictive order. Such motion must be 4 accompanied by a competent declaration in which the movant describes the 5 parties’ efforts to resolve the matter by agreement. 6 7.3 Unauthorized Disclosures. If Confidential Information is disclosed 7 to any person (for the purposes of this paragraph, “person” shall have the meanings 8 listed in paragraphs 7.1.1(a)-(h)) other than in the manner authorized by this 9 Protective Order, the party or person responsible for the disclosure, and any other 10 party or person who is subject to this Order and learns of such disclosure, shall 11 immediately bring such disclosure to the attention of the Designating Party. 12 Without prejudice to other rights and remedies of the Designating Party, the 13 responsible party or person shall make every effort to obtain the return of the 14 Confidential Information and to prevent further disclosure on its own part or on the 15 part of the person who was the unauthorized recipient of such information. 16 7.4 Court Filings. In the event any Confidential Information must be 17 filed with the Court prior to the trial, the party making the proposed filing shall 18 seek to have such filing be under seal by complying with Local Rule 79-5. 19 8. 20 HANDLING DURING TRIAL If a party seeks to introduce at trial Confidential Information that is subject 21 to this Order, the parties shall seek to have the trial judge implement appropriate 22 terms and conditions on the use of the Confidential Information at trial that is 23 sufficient to protect the confidentiality of the information and/or document. 24 9. 25 HANDLING AFTER DISPOSITION Within 90 days of the conclusion of this litigation (including any appeals), 26 the Designating Party may request that any or all Confidential Information be 27 returned to the Designating Party. After receiving a request to return, the 28 Receiving Party at its option may destroy Confidential Information instead of [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES - 13 - LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 returning it to the Designating party, but must so notify the Designating Party. The 2 request for return shall specifically identify the documents or things to be returned 3 if return of less than all Confidential Information is requested. The attorney for the 4 Receiving Party shall collect, assemble and return within 60 days all such 5 Confidential Information, including all copies and extracts thereof in the 6 possession of the Receiving Party, its counsel or other authorized recipients, but 7 not including copies, extracts or summaries that contain or constitute attorney work 8 product. If such work product is retained, however, the Confidential Information 9 contained herein will continue to be controlled by this Protective Order. Receipt of 10 returned Confidential Information shall be acknowledged in writing if such an 11 acknowledgment is requested. 12 10. 13 USE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION Confidential Information shall not be used by any person, other than the 14 Producing Party, for any purpose other than prosecuting, defending or settling this 15 litigation. In no event shall Confidential Information be used for any business, 16 competitive, personal, private, public or other purpose, except as required by law. 17 Documents that are to be protected under this Protective Order contain information 18 which the parties contend is confidential including research, development, and 19 commercial information that is valuable in Hawaiian’s respective business. 20 In this case, the good cause for keeping these documents confidential 21 includes the need to preserve the parties’ current and/or future competitive 22 advantage. If third parties gain access to the confidential information, the parties’ 23 businesses would suffer specific prejudice or harm because their competitive 24 advantage would be compromised or lost. This finding of prejudice is made for the 25 purpose of complying with Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co., 331 26 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). 27 11. 28 NO IMPLIED WAIVERS The entry of this Order shall not be interpreted as a waiver of the right to [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES - 14 - LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 object, pursuant to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to the furnishing of 2 information in response to discovery requests or to object to a requested inspection 3 of documents or facilities. Neither the agreement to, nor the taking of any action in 4 accordance with the provisions of this Protective Order, nor the failure to object 5 thereto, shall be interpreted as a waiver of any claim or position or defense in this 6 action, or any other actions. 7 12. MODIFICATION 8 In the event any party hereto seeks a Court order to modify the terms of this 9 Order, said party shall make such request by written stipulation or noticed motion 10 to all parties that must be served and filed in accordance with local court rules. 11 13. 12 CARE IN STORAGE Any person in possession of Confidential Information produced by another 13 party shall exercise reasonable and appropriate care with regard to the storage, 14 custody, copying, and use of the Confidential Information to ensure that the 15 confidential and sensitive nature of same is maintained. 16 14. 17 NO ADMISSION Neither this Order nor the designation of any item as “CONFIDENTIAL” 18 shall be construed as an admission that such material, or any testimony concerning 19 such material, would be admissible in evidence in this litigation or in any other 20 proceeding. 21 15. NO APPLICATION 22 Notwithstanding any other provision of this Order to the contrary, the 23 confidentiality obligations of this Order shall not apply, or shall cease to apply, to 24 any information that (a) at the time of disclosure hereunder, was already lawfully 25 in the possession of the receiving party and was not acquired through discovery or 26 under any obligation of confidentiality; or (b) at the time of disclosure hereunder 27 was, or subsequently becomes, through no fault of the receiving party, a public 28 document or publicly available. Furthermore, nothing in this Order shall preclude [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES - 15 - LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 any party to this Order from disclosing or using any information or documents not 2 obtained pursuant to discovery, even though the same information or documents 3 may have been produced by a party and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL”. 4 16. 5 INADVERTENT PRODUCTION Nothing in this Order abridges applicable law concerning inadvertent 6 production of a document that the Producing Party believes contains attorney- 7 client communications, attorney work product, or otherwise privileged 8 information. 9 17. 10 PARTIES’ OWN DOCUMENTS This Order shall in no way restrict the parties in their use of their own 11 documents and information, and nothing in this Order shall preclude any party 12 from voluntarily disclosing its own documents or information to any party or non- 13 party. 14 18. 15 NO EFFECT ON OTHER RIGHTS This Order shall in no way abrogate or diminish any pre-existing 16 contractual, statutory, or other legal obligations or rights of any party with respect 17 to Confidential Information. 18 19. 19 EXECUTION IN COUNTERPARTS This agreement may be executed in counterparts. Facsimile signatures will 20 be considered as valid signatures as of the date hereof. 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES - 16 - LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 2 20. EFFECT OF ORDER This Order is binding on all parties to this action and on all parties who have 3 agreed to be bound by this Order, and shall remain in full force and effect until 4 modified, superseded or terminated by consent of the parties or by Order of Court. 5 This Court expressly retains jurisdiction over this action for enforcement of the 6 provisions of this Order following the resolution of this litigation. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED 9 10 Dated: March 23, 2017 _________________________ 11 Hon. Karen E. Scott 12 United States Magistrate Judge 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES - 17 - LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 EXHIBIT A 2 CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT 3 4 5 I, __________________________, declare under penalty of perjury that: 1. I have reviewed and agree to comply with and be bound by the 6 provisions of the Stipulated Protective Order (the “Order”), and I attest to my 7 understanding that access to information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” may 8 be provided to me and that such access shall be pursuant to the terms and 9 conditions and restrictions of the Order. I understand and acknowledge that failure 10 to comply with the Order could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the 11 nature of contempt. 12 2. I understand that I am to retain all copies of any information 13 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” in a secure manner, and that all copies are to 14 remain in my personal custody until this action is terminated or until I have 15 completed by assigned duties, whichever occurs earlier, whereupon the copies and 16 any writings prepared by me containing any information designated as 17 “CONFIDENTIAL” are to be destroyed or returned to counsel who provided me 18 with such material at the option of counsel. 19 3. I will not divulge to persons other than those specifically authorized 20 by said Order, and will not copy or use except solely for the purpose of this action, 21 any information designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” obtained pursuant to said 22 Order, except as provided in said Order. I also agree to notify any stenographic or 23 clerical personnel who are required to assist me of the terms of said Order. 24 4. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States 25 District Court, for the Central District of California, for the purpose of enforcing 26 the terms of the Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after this 27 action is terminated. 28 5. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES - 18 - LAOFFICE 157920V.1 1 of America that the foregoing is true and correct. 2 3 Executed on ____________ ____, 20___. 4 5 Signature: _________________________ 6 Name: 7 Title: 8 Affiliation: 9 Address: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER CASE No. 8:16-CV-02109 JLS-KES - 19 - LAOFFICE 157920V.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?