Murad, LLC v. Dinh Nguyen

Filing 27

JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court enters judgment for Plaintiff and against Defendant. Defendant and any of his agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, in active concert and participation with him (the "Enjoined Parties"), are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED as follows: Refer to Order. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (es)

1
2

JS-6

3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

SOUTHERN DIVISION – SANTA ANA

9
10
11

Murad, LLC,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14

Case No. SACV 16-02123 AG (DFMx)
JUDGMENT

v.
Dinh Nguyen,
Defendant.

15
16
17
18
19

The Court enters judgment for Plaintiff and against Defendant.

Defendant and any of his agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, in active concert

20

and participation with him (the “Enjoined Parties”), are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED as

21

follows:

22
23
24
25
26

 The Enjoined Parties are prohibited from advertising or selling Murad products,
through the internet or otherwise;
 The Enjoined Parties are prohibited from directly or indirectly using Murad’s
trademarks, including advertising on the internet;

27
28
JUDGMENT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

 The Enjoined Parties are prohibited from importing, exporting, manufacturing,
producing, distributing, circulating, selling, offering to sell, facilitating the sale of,
shipping, packaging, advertising, promoting, or displaying Murad’s products, as well as
products bearing Murad’s trademarks;
 The Enjoined Parties are required to remove Murad’s trademarks and reference to
Murad’s products from their websites, including www.leeeyelash.com, and their online
storefronts on www.ebay.com and www.amazon.com (the “Enjoined Parties’

9
10

websites”);

11

 The Enjoined Parties are reasonably required to request removal of online search

12

results that associate Murad’s products or Murad’s trademarks with the Enjoined

13

Parties or the Enjoined Parties’ websites; and

14
15

 The Enjoined Parties are reasonably prohibited from disposing of, destroying, altering,

16

removing, concealing, or tampering with records regarding products they have sold

17

that display Murad’s trademarks.

18
19
20
21

Dated April 10, 2017

____________________________________
Hon. Andrew J. Guilford
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

JUDGMENT